Literature DB >> 8888434

Interdigestive and postprandial motility in small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

P O Stotzer1, E S Björnsson, H Abrahamsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motility disorders are believed to be of major pathogenetic importance in small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The aim of this study was to investigate interdigestive and postprandial motility in a group of patients with SIBO and to compare the results with those of healthy volunteers.
METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects and 14 patients with SIBO were included. Exclusion criteria were obvious predisposing conditions. Antroduodenojejunal pressure recording was performed after an overnight fast. After a 5-h interdigestive recording a standard meal was given, and postprandial recording performed for 30 min.
RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients than healthy subjects had phase-III activity in the antrum (3 of 14 versus 15 of 20; P < 0.01), and more patients lacked phase III completely (5 of 14 versus 0 of 20; P < 0.05). Propagated single contractions in the proximal duodenum during late phase II and postprandially were also significantly reduced (1 (0-5) versus 8 (5-12) per 30 min (median; interquartile range (IQR)) (P < 0.01) and 0.5 (IQR, 0-6.5) versus 8 (IQR, 6-13) per 30 min (P < 0.01), respectively). In the distal part of the duodenum the patients had significantly prolonged duration of phase III (7.8; IQR, 5.6-9.2 versus 5.9; IQR, 4.2-6.6 min) (P < 0.05) and increased motility index of phase III (6685; IQR, 4870-9999 versus 3605; IQR, 2579-5544 mm Hg x min/30 min) (P < 0.05), late phase II (10,285; IQR, 6105-11,384 versus 6650; IQR, 4639-9102) (P < 0.05), and postprandially (12,960; IQR, 8454-18,644 versus 7917; IQR, 6132-10,551) (P < 0.05). Retrograde contractions predominated in the late part of phase III in the proximal duodenum in both groups. The cycle length of the MMC and the number of clustered contractions showed no difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with SIBO, compared with healthy subjects, lack interdigestive phase-III activity, not only in the small intestine but also in the gastric antrum. They also have fewer propagated contractions in the proximal duodenum during interdigestive phase II. On the other hand, the motility index in the distal part of the duodenum was higher in patients with SIBO during phase III, late phase II, and postprandially. The results are compatible with a reduced clearing function in the stomach and proximal duodenum and/or a compensatory increase of motility in the region of the duodenojejunal flexure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888434     DOI: 10.3109/00365529609051995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  14 in total

1.  Small intestinal clustered contractions and bacterial overgrowth: a frequent finding in obese patients.

Authors:  Ana María Madrid; Jaime Poniachik; Rodrigo Quera; Carlos Defilippi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Gastrointestinal disorders in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  V B Nieuwenhuijs; B R Bloem
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Low ileocecal valve pressure is significantly associated with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO).

Authors:  Bani Chander Roland; Maria M Ciarleglio; John O Clarke; John R Semler; Eric Tomakin; Gerard E Mullin; Pankaj Jay Pasricha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Assessment of gastric emptying: comparison of solid scintigraphic emptying and emptying of radiopaque markers in patients and healthy subjects.

Authors:  P O Stotzer; M Fjälling; J Grétarsdóttir; H Abrahamsson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Vagal dysfunction and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: novel pathways to chronic inflammation in HIV.

Authors:  Jessica Robinson-Papp; Alexandra Nmashie; Elizabeth Pedowitz; Emma K T Benn; Mary Catherine George; Sandeep Sharma; Jacinta Murray; Josef Machac; Sherif Heiba; Saurabh Mehandru; Seunghee Kim-Schulze; Allison Navis; Isabel Elicer; Susan Morgello
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Iris Posserud; Per-Ove Stotzer; Einar S Björnsson; Hasse Abrahamsson; Magnus Simrén
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  A Prospective Evaluation of Ileocecal Valve Dysfunction and Intestinal Motility Derangements in Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.

Authors:  Bani Chander Roland; Gerard E Mullin; Monica Passi; Xi Zheng; Ahmed Salem; Robert Yolken; Pankaj Jay Pasricha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Andrew C Dukowicz; Brian E Lacy; Gary M Levine
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-02

9.  The role of interdigestive small bowel motility in the regulation of gut microflora, bacterial overgrowth, and bacterial translocation in rats.

Authors:  V B Nieuwenhuijs; A Verheem; H van Duijvenbode-Beumer; M R Visser; J Verhoef; H G Gooszen; L M Akkermans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Predisposing factors for positive D-Xylose breath test for evaluation of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a retrospective study of 932 patients.

Authors:  Richard A Schatz; Qing Zhang; Nilesh Lodhia; Jonathan Shuster; Phillip P Toskes; Baharak Moshiree
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.