Literature DB >> 8888139

Main-chain complementarity in protein-protein recognition.

I A Vakser1.   

Abstract

The existing theoretical approaches to protein-protein recognition concentrate on the details of the molecular surface at atomic resolution, while a possible role of the main chain in complex formation has been largely unexplored. To address this problem, we represented the molecules by C alpha atoms and applied the step-function potentials for intermolecular energy calculations. Since our goal was not to predict, as accurately as possible, the structure of a protein-ligand complex, but to reveal the role of the backbone in the formation of such a complex, all the potentials were identical and C alpha centered. Thus, for the specific purposes of our study, we do not simulate the difference in the side chains at the molecular surface. The structures were taken from known co-crystallized complexes. The intermolecular energy calculation was performed by a systematic 6-D search on a grid. The results revealed that in all cases tested (except antigen-antibody) the positions of the ligand at the binding site on the receptor corresponded to the lowest-energy configurations of the complex. The complementarity between the backbones, in general, may facilitate the initial placement of the ligand at the binding site of the receptor. At the same time, the identity and the specific conformation of the surface side chains play a crucial role in the next stage of the complex formation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888139     DOI: 10.1093/protein/9.9.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  11 in total

1.  A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein--protein complexes.

Authors:  I A Vakser; O G Matar; C F Lam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How common is the funnel-like energy landscape in protein-protein interactions?

Authors:  A Tovchigrechko; I A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Docking of protein models.

Authors:  Andrei Tovchigrechko; Christopher A Wells; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein-protein alternative binding modes do not overlap.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  A PRMT5-RNF168-SMURF2 Axis Controls H2AX Proteostasis.

Authors:  Changzheng Du; Landon J Hansen; Simranjit X Singh; Feiyifan Wang; Ran Sun; Casey J Moure; Kristen Roso; Paula K Greer; Hai Yan; Yiping He
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Computational simulation of the docking of Prochlorothrix hollandica plastocyanin to potosystem I: modeling the electron transfer complex.

Authors:  Eugene Myshkin; Neocles B Leontis; George S Bullerjahn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Yuval Inbar; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Protein-protein binding supersites.

Authors:  Raji Viswanathan; Eduardo Fajardo; Gabriel Steinberg; Matthew Haller; Andras Fiser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.