Literature DB >> 8886761

Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.

J D Forrest1, R Samara.   

Abstract

Of U.S. women who use a reversible method of contraception, 24% each year obtain family planning services from a publicly funded clinic or a private doctor reimbursed by Medicaid. If these subsidized contraceptive services were not available, women who currently use them would have an estimated 1.3 million additional unplanned pregnancies annually, of which 29% would involve women aged 15-19, 67% would involve never-married women and 61% would involve women with a household income below 200% of the federal poverty level. An estimated 632,300 of these pregnancies would end in induced abortion, an increase of 40% over the current national level. Another 533,800 pregnancies would result in unintended births. Some 76,400 of these would be births to families already receiving public assistance, and 64,100 would be to families that would become eligible for public assistance because of the birth; another 197,000 would be to women whose families would not receive public assistance, but would be eligible for Medicaid coverage of pregnancy, delivery and newborn care. In FY 1987, public-sector expenditures for contraceptive services totaled an estimated $412 million. If subsidized services had not been available, the federal and state governments would have spent an additional $1.2 billion through their Medicaid programs for expenses associated with unplanned births and abortions. Thus, for every dollar spent to provide publicly funded contraceptive services, an average of $3.00 was saved in Medical costs for pregnancy-related health care and medical care for newborns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion, Induced; Americas; Cost Effectiveness; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Economic Factors; Evaluation; Evaluation Indexes; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs--cost; Fertility; Fertility Control, Postconception; Financial Activities; Financing, Government; Government Sponsored Programs--beneficial effects; Medical Assistance, Title 19; North America; Northern America; Organization And Administration; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Programs; Public Assistance; Quantitative Evaluation; Reproductive Behavior; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8886761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  9 in total

1.  The impact of government policies and neighborhood characteristics on teenage sexual activity and contraceptive use.

Authors:  Susan L Averett; Daniel I Rees; Laura M Argys
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California.

Authors:  Gorette Amaral; Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Carolyn Bradner Jasik; Signy Judd; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Unwanted pregnancy in Armenia--the larger context.

Authors:  W Chavkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Daria P Rostovtseva; Claire D Brindis; M Antonia Biggs; Denis Hulett; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Cynthia M Klaisle; Maya Blum; Mary E Bradsberry; Claire D Brindis; Felicia H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Reasons for ineffective pre-pregnancy contraception use in patients seeking abortion services.

Authors:  Juell B Homco; Jeffrey F Peipert; Gina M Secura; Vanessa A Lewis; Jenifer E Allsworth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Kentucky pharmacists' perceptions regarding provision of hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Dustin K Miracle; GYeon Oh; Michael Singleton; Clark D Kebodeaux; Joseph L Fink; Patricia R Freeman
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-07-21

8.  The macroeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Yana van der Meulen Rodgers; Ernestina Coast; Samantha R Lattof; Cheri Poss; Brittany Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Adam Sonfield; Mia R Zolna; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.911

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.