OBJECTIVE: A clinical study was performed to assess the diagnostic value of spiral CT for evaluation of response during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal-junction (GEJ). Results were compared to those of endoscopy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Twenty-five patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the GEJ scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant CTx were studied. Before CT examination, 1200 ml of a vanilla flavoured paraffin emulsion were applied orally to the fasting patients and 40 mg BuscopanR or 2 mg glucagon were injected i.v. for hypotonia. Iodine (100 ml) was injected automatically (3 ml/s) and the CT scan was started 10 s after complete administration of CM. For response evaluation to CTx, four standardized parameters were measured by two experienced, blinded radiologists. The results were categorized according to the WHO classification of 1981 and compared to those of endoscopy. RESULTS: In 24 of 25 patients endoscopic and computed tomographic response evaluation showed a close correlation (r = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Spiral CT with negative oral contrast agent is a suitable technique for monitoring of GEJ masses. In combination with standardized metric parameters it offers a quantitative response evaluation in patients with GEJ masses during neoadjuvant CTx.
OBJECTIVE: A clinical study was performed to assess the diagnostic value of spiral CT for evaluation of response during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal-junction (GEJ). Results were compared to those of endoscopy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Twenty-five patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the GEJ scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant CTx were studied. Before CT examination, 1200 ml of a vanilla flavoured paraffin emulsion were applied orally to the fasting patients and 40 mg BuscopanR or 2 mg glucagon were injected i.v. for hypotonia. Iodine (100 ml) was injected automatically (3 ml/s) and the CT scan was started 10 s after complete administration of CM. For response evaluation to CTx, four standardized parameters were measured by two experienced, blinded radiologists. The results were categorized according to the WHO classification of 1981 and compared to those of endoscopy. RESULTS: In 24 of 25 patients endoscopic and computed tomographic response evaluation showed a close correlation (r = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Spiral CT with negative oral contrast agent is a suitable technique for monitoring of GEJ masses. In combination with standardized metric parameters it offers a quantitative response evaluation in patients with GEJ masses during neoadjuvant CTx.
Authors: Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Ulas Darda Bayraktar; Soley Bayraktar; Peter Hosein; Emerson Chen; Leonidas G Koniaris; Caio Max S Rocha-Lima; Alberto J Montero Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 3.064