Literature DB >> 8884970

Use of PSA nadir to predict subsequent biochemical outcome following external beam radiation therapy for T1-2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

A L Zietman1, M K Tibbs, K C Dallow, C T Smith, A F Althausen, R A Zlotecki, W U Shipley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed the ability of nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to act as an early surrogate for subsequent freedom from biochemical failure following radiation therapy for T1-2 prostatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the biochemical outcome of 314 consecutive men with T1-2 disease treated by conventional external beam radiation at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Minimum follow up was 2 years, and failure was defined as three successive rises in serum PSA of greater than 10%. Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis of outcome was employed.
RESULTS: The overall 5-year freedom from biochemical progression was 63%. For those who achieved a PSA nadir of < or = 0.5 ng/ml (n = 123) it was 90%, for 0.6-1.0 ng/ml (n = 103) it was 55%, and for > 1.0 ng/ml (n = 88) it was 34%. Multivariate analysis showed an undetectable PSA nadir to be independent of Gleason grade and initial PSA in predicting subsequent outcome (P < 0.05). The likelihood of achieving an undetectable PSA nadir correlated strongly with the pretreatment value: 74% if this was below 4 ng/ml; 42% for those between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml; and 32% for those above 10 ng/ml.
CONCLUSION: A PSA nadir of < or = 0.5 ng/ml represents an early endpoint strongly predictive of a favorable outcome following radiation therapy which may be used for the rapid assessment of new radiation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8884970     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(96)01770-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  19 in total

1.  Radiotherapy: PSA nadir predicts long-term mortality.

Authors:  Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Hormone therapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Payne; A Khan; S Chowdhury; R Davda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Salvage cryosurgery of the prostate after radiation failure.

Authors:  John S Lam; Arie S Belldegrun
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Treatment options after failure of radiation therapy-a review.

Authors:  Daniel B Rukstalis
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

5.  Radiation therapy failure in prostate cancer patients: risk factors and methods of detection.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 6.  Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicole M Golbari; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Prostate-specific antigen nadir within 12 months of prostate cancer radiotherapy predicts metastasis and death.

Authors:  Pino Alcantara; Alexandra Hanlon; Mark K Buyyounouski; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jared M Cox; J Erik Busby
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Prostate-specific antigen nadir and testosterone level at prostate-specific antigen failure following radiation and androgen suppression therapy for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer and the risk of all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Danielle S Bitterman; Ming-Hui Chen; Jing Wu; Andrew A Renshaw; Marian Loffredo; Philip W Kantoff; Eric J Small; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 6.921

10.  Hypofractionated SBRT versus conventionally fractionated EBRT for prostate cancer: comparison of PSA slope and nadir.

Authors:  Mekhail Anwar; Vivian Weinberg; Albert J Chang; I-Chow Hsu; Mack Roach; Alexander Gottschalk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.