Literature DB >> 8883008

The effect of positioning on shoulder isokinetic measures in females.

L L Tis1, T Maxwell.   

Abstract

Weakness of the shoulder rotator musculature is a frequently encountered clinical concern in shoulder injuries. However, glenohumeral internal and external rotation in the frontal plane (FP) in an abducted position often causes impingement of the supraspinatus tendon, whereas similar activity in the scapular plane (SP) does not cause impingement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if assessment in two planes affected bilateral internal and external peak torque (PT), total work (TW), and average power (AP). Twenty recreationally active females (age = 24.9 yr; ht = 163.3 cm; wt = 60.7 kg) were randomly assessed in FP and SP for dominant and nondominant side shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) isokinetic strength (Cybex 6000, Lumex Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY). Subjects were assessed at 1.047 and 2.094 rad.s-1 in the supine position with the shoulder abducted to 90 degrees. Four-way MANOVA revealed significant differences for PT, TW, and AP in all measured conditions (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that muscular strength is affected by positioning in different planes. Due to differences in PT, TW, and AP, it is advisable to maintain consistent positioning during assessment to assure consistency in the reporting of muscular performance variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883008     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199609000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  5 in total

1.  Biopsychosocial influence on shoulder pain: Rationale and protocol for a pre-clinical trial.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Roland Staud; Paul A Borsa; Samuel S Wu; Margaret R Wallace; Warren H Greenfield; Lauren N Mackie; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Pain-related fear and catastrophizing predict pain intensity and disability independently using an induced muscle injury model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Parr; Paul A Borsa; Roger B Fillingim; Mark D Tillman; Todd M Manini; Chris M Gregory; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Range of motion as a predictor of clinical shoulder pain during recovery from delayed-onset muscle soreness.

Authors:  Kelly A Larkin-Kaiser; Jeffrey J Parr; Paul A Borsa; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Biopsychosocial influence on exercise-induced delayed onset muscle soreness at the shoulder: pain catastrophizing and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) diplotype predict pain ratings.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Geoffrey C Dover; Margaret R Wallace; Brandon K Sack; Deborah M Herbstman; Ece Aydog; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Are shoulders with a reverse shoulder prosthesis strong enough? A pilot study.

Authors:  Tjarco D W Alta; H E J Veeger; Thomas W J Janssen; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.