Literature DB >> 8881913

Solid tissue culture for cytogenetic analysis: a collaborative survey for the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists.

C S Rodgers1, M R Creasy, M Fitchett, C T Maliszewska, N R Pratt, J J Waters.   

Abstract

AIMS: To survey the diagnostic service provided by UK laboratories for the culture of solid tissue samples (excluding tumours) and in particular to examine the variation in culture success rates and the problems of maternal cell overgrowth.
METHODS: Twenty seven laboratories took part in a collaborative survey during 1992. Each laboratory submitted data on up to a maximum of 60 consecutive specimens (n = 1361) over a six month period.
RESULTS: Skin specimens, the largest category received (n = 520), were the most problematic (51% success rate). Culture success rates were significantly lower (43%) when skin specimens (n = 140) were transported dry to the laboratory. Success rates for skin specimens also varied, depending on the origin of the specimen, from 18% for intra-uterine deaths (IUD) (n = 94) to 85% for neonatal deaths (n = 33) and 83% for live patients (n = 54). Culture of selected extra-fetal tissues from IUD, stillbirths and following elective termination of pregnancy (TOP) gave comparable success rates to those achieved for skin samples from neonatal deaths and live births. Skewed sex ratios, female > male, were identified for products of conception (POC) (n = 298) and placental biopsy specimens (n = 97).
CONCLUSIONS: By appropriate selection, transport and processing of tissues, and in particular by avoiding relying solely on skin samples from IUD, stillbirths and TOP, an increase in culture success rates for solid tissue samples submitted for cytogenetic analysis could be achieved. The high risk of maternal cell contamination from POC and placental biopsy specimens was also identified in this survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8881913      PMCID: PMC500606          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.49.8.638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  4 in total

1.  Examination of fetuses after induced abortion for fetal abnormality.

Authors:  J Clayton-Smith; P A Farndon; C McKeown; D Donnai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-03

2.  Cytogenetics in the evaluation of perinatal death.

Authors:  P M Ellis; A D Bain
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-03-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Increased incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities in chorionic villus samples from pregnancies established by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

Authors:  P A In't Veld; D van Opstal; C Van den Berg; M Van Ooijen; H Brandenburg; L Pijpers; M G Jahoda; T H Stijnen; F J Los
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Evaluation of a protocol for post-mortem examination of stillbirths.

Authors:  R F Mueller; V P Sybert; J Johnson; Z A Brown; W J Chen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cytogenetics 40 years on.

Authors:  J A Crolla
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Aneusomy detection with Karyolite-Bac on Beads® is a cost-efficient and high throughput strategy in the molecular analyses of the early pregnancy conception losses.

Authors:  Javier Pérez-Durán; Zenyese Nájera; Yanelly Trujillo-Cabrera; Mónica Martín-Saro; Ethel García-Latorre; Jaime Escarcega-Preciado; Nayelli Nájera; Teresa Martínez-Galaviz; Gloria Queipo
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.