PURPOSE: To identify and describe the normal intradural vessels detected on MR angiograms of the thoracolumbar spine. METHODS: Six adult subjects who had clinical evidence of myelopathy, yet normal findings at spinal digital subtraction angiography (DSA), were also studied without and with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and three-dimensional time-of-flight, single-slab MR angiography. Sagittal and coronal subvolume (targeted) maximum intensity projection images were compared with arterial and venous phase DSA images. Angiographic images were then compared with postmortem, formalin-fixed cord specimens. RESULTS: Recognizable intradural vessels were detected only on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. These vessels corresponded to the posterior and/or anterior median (midline) veins and the great medullary veins. The median veins had variable but mild tortuosity. The medullary veins, which extended from the median veins and coronal venous plexus on the cord surface to the epidural venous plexus, were relatively straight and usually located at T-12 or L-1. The anterior spinal artery could partially contribute to the anterior midline vascular signal. CONCLUSION: The intradural vessels identified on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms are primarily veins, and these are usually the largest vessels on or near the cord surface. The limited number and minimal tortuosity of these veins may serve as a baseline for the examination of patients with clinically suspected arteriovenous malformation or fistula.
PURPOSE: To identify and describe the normal intradural vessels detected on MR angiograms of the thoracolumbar spine. METHODS: Six adult subjects who had clinical evidence of myelopathy, yet normal findings at spinal digital subtraction angiography (DSA), were also studied without and with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and three-dimensional time-of-flight, single-slab MR angiography. Sagittal and coronal subvolume (targeted) maximum intensity projection images were compared with arterial and venous phase DSA images. Angiographic images were then compared with postmortem, formalin-fixed cord specimens. RESULTS: Recognizable intradural vessels were detected only on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. These vessels corresponded to the posterior and/or anterior median (midline) veins and the great medullary veins. The median veins had variable but mild tortuosity. The medullary veins, which extended from the median veins and coronal venous plexus on the cord surface to the epidural venous plexus, were relatively straight and usually located at T-12 or L-1. The anterior spinal artery could partially contribute to the anterior midline vascular signal. CONCLUSION: The intradural vessels identified on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms are primarily veins, and these are usually the largest vessels on or near the cord surface. The limited number and minimal tortuosity of these veins may serve as a baseline for the examination of patients with clinically suspected arteriovenous malformation or fistula.
Authors: Efrat Saraf-Lavi; Brian C Bowen; Robert M Quencer; Evelyn M L Sklar; Alan Holz; Steve Falcone; Richard E Latchaw; Robert Duncan; Ajay Wakhloo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M I Vargas; J Gariani; R Sztajzel; I Barnaure-Nachbar; B M Delattre; K O Lovblad; J-L Dietemann Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sang Jung Park; Chang Ha Kim; Jin Dong Kim; Soon Ho Um; Sun Young Yim; Min Ho Seo; Dae In Lee; Jun Hyuk Kang; Bora Keum; Yong Sik Kim Journal: Clin Mol Hepatol Date: 2012-09-25