Literature DB >> 8880737

Locating reward cue at response manipulandum (CAM) induces symptoms of drug abuse.

A Tomie1.   

Abstract

Appetitive instrumental discrimination learning procedures provide for CAM (cue and manipulandum) when the reward cue (discriminative stimulus positively correlated with positive reinforcement) is located at the response manipulandum (object that when contacted or manipulated defines the performance of the instrumental response). Evidence reviewed shows that CAM induces excessive and compulsive instrumental responding relative to otherwise comparable non-CAM control procedures. In humans, symptoms of drug abuse are particularly likely when the drug-taking implement (response manipulandum at which instrumental drug-taking is directed) is also predictive of the drug's rewarding effects (reward cue). Evidence that the predictive relationship between a drug-taking implement and drug reward relates to drug abuse is reviewed, and implications for treatment and prevention are considered. CAM is related to neurobiological models of drug abuse that emphasize the role of the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA). CAM produces convergence of DA-mediated responding for conditioned reinforcement with DA mediation of psychomotor activation and incentive-motivational processes to yield reflexive cue-directed responding not observed in non-CAM controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880737     DOI: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00023-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  50 in total

1.  Behavioural approach tendencies to heroin-related stimuli in abstinent heroin abusers.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhou; Xinyu Li; Meng Zhang; Feng Zhang; Chen Zhu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Amygdala central nucleus function is necessary for learning, but not expression, of conditioned auditory orienting.

Authors:  Frank Groshek; Erin Kerfoot; Vanessa McKenna; Alan S Polackwich; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Terry E Robinson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-29

8.  Cue-evoked cocaine "craving": role of dopamine in the accumbens core.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Predicting extinction and reinstatement of alcohol and sucrose self-administration in outbred rats.

Authors:  Therese A Kosten; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.