Literature DB >> 8880517

Assessment of routine use of an anaerobic bottle in a three-component, high-volume blood culture system.

W C Hellinger1, J J Cawley, S Alvarez, S F Hogan, W S Harmesen, D M Ilstrup, F R Cockerill.   

Abstract

The relative value of routine anaerobic blood culture for recovery of organisms and identification of episodes of bloodstream infection was assessed in a three-component, high-volume blood culture system which employs aerobic and anaerobic bottles of BacT/Alert (Organon-Teknika, Durham, N.C.) and aerobic cultures of Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.). The results of 5,595 blood culture sets from patients with suspected bloodstream infection were analyzed. Compared with either the aerobic BacT/Alert bottle or aerobic culture of Isolator, the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle recovered significantly fewer isolates (242 versus 294, P < 0.05; 242 versus 298, P < 0.05) but did not detect significantly fewer episodes of bloodstream infection (141 versus 157, P > 0.05; 141 versus 147, P > 0.05). The BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle recovered significantly more isolates of obligately anaerobic bacteria (16 versus 4, P < 0.05; 16 versus 0, P < 0.05) and detected significantly more episodes of bloodstream infection caused by obligately anaerobic bacteria (10 versus 3, P < 0.05; 10 versus 0, P < 0.05) than either the aerobic bottle of BacT/Alert or the aerobic culture of Isolator. The combination of the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle and the aerobic culture of Isolator recovered as may isolates (374 versus 377) and detected as many episodes of bloodstream infection (194 versus 191) as the combination of the aerobic bottle of BacT/Alert and the aerobic culture of Isolator, and both of these combinations identified at least 8% more isolates and detected at least 3% more bloodstream infections than the combination of the BacT/Alert aerobic and anaerobic bottles. Further analysis of the data revealed that the utility of the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle, especially when combined with the aerobic culture of Isolator, resulted from not only enhanced recovery of obligately anaerobic bacteria but also effective recovery of facultatively anaerobic bacteria. These results demonstrate the utility of the anaerobic BacT/Alert bottle for detecting bloodstream infection caused by either facultatively anaerobic bacteria or obligately anaerobic bacteria and support the routine inclusion of anaerobic blood culture in the three-component blood culture system used in our hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880517      PMCID: PMC229314          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2544-2547.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples.

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Bacteraemia--a New York perception.

Authors:  H C Neu; M Fracaro; H Bopp; M O'Keefe; J O'Connor
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Anaerobic bacteremia.

Authors:  W R Wilson; W J Martin; C J Wilkowske; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  The Norplant System: where are we in 1995?

Authors:  A G Thomas; S M LeMelle
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Detection of bacteremia in adults: consequences of culturing an inadequate volume of blood.

Authors:  L A Mermel; D G Maki
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  D M Ilstrup; J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 7.  Bacteremia and fungemia in the immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  T E Kiehn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Anaerobic bacteremia: decreasing rate over a 15-year period.

Authors:  C W Dorsher; J E Rosenblatt; W R Wilson; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

9.  Anaerobic bacteremia: incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significance.

Authors:  D P Lombardi; N C Engleberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.965

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Assessing how many blood cultures are needed for detecting bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Federico G Nicola
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  M Lafaurie; E d'Anglejan; J L Donay; D Glotz; E Sarfati; M Mimoun; M Legrand; E Oksenhendler; M Bagot; S Valade; B Bercot; J M Molina
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.090

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.