Literature DB >> 8879718

Who responds to electroconvulsive therapy? A comparison of effective and ineffective forms of treatment.

C Sobin1, J Prudic, D P Devanand, M S Nobler, H A Sackeim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that real ECT is more effective than simulated treatment among depressed patients with delusions and/or retardation, and that ECT is not effective among depressed patients who lack these features.
METHOD: In two randomised, double-blind studies, 143 patients with major depression were subtyped regarding psychosis, retardation and agitation. In both studies, low dosage, right unilateral ECT was ineffective compared with other forms of ECT. This report examined whether the depressive subtypes differed in clinical response to the ineffective and effective forms of ECT.
RESULTS: The therapeutic advantage of effective forms of ECT was similar across the depression subtypes. Patients who lacked both psychosis and retardation showed this pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings cast doubt on the utility of these depression subtypes in predicting ECT response. ECT is a viable treatment option for patients with major depression regardless of the presence or absence of psychosis, retardation and/or agitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8879718     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.169.3.322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  6 in total

1.  [Vagus nerve stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depressive disorders].

Authors:  M Bajbouj; I Heuser
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Clinical variables as predictors of response to electroconvulsive therapy in endogenous depression.

Authors:  N Gupta; A Avasthi; P Kulhara
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Predictors of response to electro-convulsive therapy in major depression.

Authors:  B Sivaprakash; R Chandrasekaran; A Sahai
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Symptom predictors of response to electroconvulsive therapy in older patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Keiichiro Tominaga; Mioto Okazaki; Hisashi Higuchi; Itaru Utagawa; Etsuko Nakamura; Noboru Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 5.  Psychomotor retardation in depression: a systematic review of diagnostic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Djamila Bennabi; Pierre Vandel; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Thierry Pozzo; Emmanuel Haffen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Predictors of the short-term responder rate of Electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders--a population based study.

Authors:  Axel Nordenskjöld; Lars von Knorring; Ingemar Engström
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.