Literature DB >> 8879714

The TAPS project. 36: the most difficult to place long-stay psychiatric in-patients. Outcome one year after relocation. Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services.

N Trieman1, J Leff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical and social outcomes were evaluated of "difficult to place" (DTP) patients discharged from hospital to alternative facilities.
METHOD: In the course of a reprovision programme for a psychiatric hospital, 72 long-stay patients were considered to be too problematic to live within the usual range of community placements. Their clinical and social state was assessed shortly before the hospital closed. Severe, persistent behavioural problems were recorded for each subject at baseline. One year after being relocated, patients were reassessed.
RESULTS: Clinical and social measures were stable over time. The profile of severe behavioural problems changed over time, with one-third of the total problems subsiding and a similar number of new problems emerging. There was a significant reduction in physical aggression. One of the settings provided an environment as free of restrictions as the usual community homes.
CONCLUSIONS: The most difficult patients to reprovide for can be contained in a relatively non-restrictive care environment. There is some indication that aggressive behaviour can improve, raising the possibility that some DTP patients can move on to the usual community homes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8879714     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.169.3.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  6 in total

1.  Symptom severity and personal functioning among patients with schizophrenia discharged from long-term hospital care into the community.

Authors:  T Trauer
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2001-04

2.  From a 'state mental hospital' to new homes in the city: longitudinal research into the use of intramural facilities by long-stay care-dependent psychiatric clients in Amsterdam.

Authors:  Pim Duurkoop; Richard van Dyck
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2003-02

3.  The process of care in residential facilities--a national survey in Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Santone; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ian Falloon; Angelo Fioritti; Rocco Micciolo; Angelo Picardi; Enrico Zanalda
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Outcome of long stay psychiatric patients resettled in the community: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  N Trieman; J Leff; G Glover
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-03

5.  Predictors of outcomes for users of mental health rehabilitation services: a 5-year retrospective cohort study in inner London, UK.

Authors:  Helen Killaspy; Panagiotis Zis
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Expert Arguments for Trends of Psychiatric Bed Numbers: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Data.

Authors:  Adrian P Mundt; Sabine Delhey Langerfeldt; Enzo Rozas Serri; Mathias Siebenförcher; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.