Literature DB >> 8878506

Open vs. closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results.

J Garcia-Aguilar1, C Belmonte, W D Wong, A C Lowry, R D Madoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare the healing rate and long-term effects on continence of open and closed lateral internal sphincterotomy.
METHODS: Charts of 864 patients with chronic anal fissure who underwent internal sphincterotomy as a single procedure over five years by a group of 12 colorectal surgeons were reviewed. Open internal sphincterotomy (OIS) was performed in 521 patients, whereas 343 had closed internal sphincterotomy (CIS). There was no difference in sex or age between the groups. A questionnaire inquiring about clinical outcome, changes in continence, and degree of satisfaction with the procedure was mailed to all patients. A total of 549 (63.5 percent) patients, 324 (62.2 percent) with OIS and 225 (65.6 percent) with CIS, returned their questionnaires. Average follow-up was three (range, 1-6) years.
RESULTS: Differences in persistence of symptoms (3.4 OIS vs. 5.3 percent CIS), recurrence of the fissure (10.9 vs. 11.7 percent CIS), and need for reoperation (3.4 percent OIS vs. 4 percent CIS) were statistically not significant. However, statistically significant differences were seen in the percentage of patients with permanent postoperative difficulty controlling gas (30.3 vs. 23.6 percent; P 0.062), soiling underclothing (26.7 vs. 16.1 percent; P < 0.001), and accidental bowel movements (11.8 vs. 3.1 percent; P < 0.001) between those who underwent OIS and those who had CIS. Although 90 percent of patients reported general overall satisfaction, more patients undergoing CIS (64.4 percent) than OIS (49.7 percent) were very satisfied with the results of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Lateral internal sphincterotomy is highly effective in treatment of chronic anal fissure but is associated with significant permanent alterations in continence. CIS is preferable to OIS because it effects a similar rate of cure with less impairment of control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878506     DOI: 10.1007/bf02054061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

Review 1.  Operative treatment of anal fissure.

Authors:  A G Acheson; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  A review of operative procedures for anal fissure.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Operative procedures for fissure in ano.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson; Arpita Chattopadhyay; William Brooks; Isobel Platt; Thumri Paavana; Sophie Earl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

4.  Treatment of anal fissure.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-16

5.  Lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic idiopathic anal fissure: an alternative approach.

Authors:  Samer Saad Bessa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Current concepts in anal fissures.

Authors:  Abraham A Ayantunde; Samuel A Debrah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  A review of chronic anal fissure management.

Authors:  E E Collins; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  0.4% nitroglycerin ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure pain : a viewpoint by Laurence R. Sands.

Authors:  Laurence R Sands
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Combined approach in the treatment of chronic anal fissures.

Authors:  S Vershenya; J Klotz; A Joos; D Bussen; A Herold
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-04-21

10.  Subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy (SLIS)--a safe technique for treatment of chronic anal fissure.

Authors:  Jim S Khan; Neil Tan; Dariush Nikkhah; Andrew J G Miles
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.