Literature DB >> 8878498

Tuberculous peritonitis--do not miss it.

G B Lisehora1, C C Peters, Y T Lee, P J Barcia.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Incidence of tuberculosis is sharply rising in the United States, and tuberculous peritonitis is often diagnosed late in the course of the disease, resulting in undue patient morbidity and mortality.
PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to better identify which clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and invasive procedures were most useful in diagnosing tuberculous peritonitis.
METHODS: All cases of tuberculous peritonitis diagnosed between 1982 and 1994 were reviewed retrospectively to discern which laboratory, radiographic, and procedural tests were helpful in diagnosing the condition.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases of tuberculous peritonitis were diagnosed during the studied period. Two patients were not diagnosed until autopsy. Patients from all socioeconomic classes and multiple races ranged in age from 3 to 69 (mean, 29.5) years. Most patients presented with a chronic wasting illness, mild abdominal pain, and fever. Purified protein derivative was only positive in 5 of 16 patients. Chest radiographs were suggestive of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in five patients. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen was helpful in five patients, and computed tomographic scan was suspicious in 16 of 17 patients. Sputum for acid fast bacillus (AFB) smear was positive in 3 of 14 patients, and paracentesis for AFB smear was positive in 1 of 8 patients. Routine blood work was not helpful. Laparoscopy was diagnostic in five of seven patients. Laparotomy and tissue biopsy of characteristic tissue for AFB smear and culture was diagnostic in 20 of 20 patients. Once diagnosed, all patients responded rapidly to empiric antituberculous medical therapy, except one patient with miliary TB who died shortly after diagnosis. A trend in earlier diagnosis was noted in recent years and is felt to be the result of an elevated index of suspicion.
CONCLUSIONS: TB peritonitis may be fatal but is medically cured if diagnosed in a timely fashion. It is essential that the clinician suspect the disease in appropriate patients. Tests frequently associated with TB such as chest radiograph and purified protein derivative are not sensitive in detection of TB peritonitis. Computed tomographic scan is the most useful radiographic study. Mini laparotomy with tissue biopsy for smear and culture is the most sensitive and specific diagnostic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878498     DOI: 10.1007/bf02054053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  Intestinal and peritoneal tuberculosis: changing trends over 10 years and a review of 80 patients.

Authors:  Yilmaz Akgun
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  A clinical dilemma: abdominal tuberculosis.

Authors:  Oya Uygur-Bayramicli; Gul Dabak; Resat Dabak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Bacterial colitis.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou; J Scott Thomas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-02

Review 4.  Abdominal tuberculosis.

Authors:  V K Kapoor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract and associated viscera.

Authors:  Thomas Malikowski; Maryam Mahmood; Thomas Smyrk; Laura Raffals; Vandana Nehra
Journal:  J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  2018-04-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.