Literature DB >> 8878028

SNOMED-encoded surgical pathology databases: a tool for epidemiologic investigation.

J J Berman1, G W Moore.   

Abstract

Pathology departments have invested considerable energy, sometimes extending over several decades, toward coding their anatomic pathology reports. As a result of these labors, there is now a vast amount of electronically coded data from surgical pathology reports, holding a wealth of information relevant to virtually every recognized pathologic entity. The original intent of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) was to prepare population-based disease data from pathology reports, but no such studies have emerged in the medical literature. This is due in part to the nonuniform, idiosyncratic, and incomplete manner in which most SNOMED databases are constructed. Automatic (computer-driven) coding provides uniformity and completeness of SNOMED databases and offers the possibility of customized recoding for an entire collection of reports using any nomenclature and any set of coding algorithms. In prior investigations, we described a computer program that SNOMED-codes surgical pathology reports, and we provided an analysis of a large surgical pathology SNOMED database. In this report, we describe the importance of coded surgical pathology databases for research, teaching, hospital administration, and public health, and we explain the functional differences between coded databases and free-text collections of surgical pathology data. Surgical pathology departments and vendors of laboratory information systems can ensure that surgical report files can be automatically coded or recoded with any chosen nomenclature by adhering to simple guidelines.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  3 in total

1.  Extension and integration of the gene ontology (GO): combining GO vocabularies with external vocabularies.

Authors:  David P Hill; Judith A Blake; Joel E Richardson; Martin Ringwald
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Doublet method for very fast autocoding.

Authors:  Jules J Berman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Resources for comparing the speed and performance of medical autocoders.

Authors:  Jules J Berman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.