Literature DB >> 8877657

Toothbrushing force in relation to plaque removal.

G A van der Weijden1, M F Timmerman, E Reijerse, C M Snoek, U van der Velden.   

Abstract

This was a 2-part study. The purpose of the 1st part was to examine the relationship between brushing force and plaque removal efficacy comparing a regular manual toothbrush (M) with an electric toothbrush the Braun/Oral-B Plak Control (B). The study consisted of a single oral prophylaxis followed by 5 experiments which differed solely in respect to toothbrushing force. At baseline (after 24-h plaque accumulation), the amount of dental plaque was evaluated and subsequently, the subject's mouth was brushed by a dental hygienist. Brushing was carried out in a random split-mouth order. Either the 1st and 3rd quadrants or the 2nd and 4th quadrants were brushed with 1 toothbrush and the 2 remaining quadrants with the other. The available time for the brushing procedure was 2 min. After brushing, the amount of remaining dental plaque was assessed. The force used in experiment 1 through 5 was 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 g, respectively. The results show that when brushing force is increased, more plaque is removed with either of the two brushes. Except for the high brushing force (300 g), the electric toothbrush removed more plaque than the manual brush. The purpose of the 2nd part was to evaluate the habitual brushing force which individuals use with various toothbrushes. Besides a manual toothbrush (M), 3 electric toothbrushes were examined, the Rotadent (R), Interplak (I) and Braun (B). 20 subjects were selected on the basis of being 'good brushers' (plaque score at screening < 25%). At baseline, each subject randomly received 1 of the 4 brushes. They were allowed a training period of 3 weeks at the end of which they were asked to abstain from brushing for at least 24 h. The plaque (Turesky modification of the Quigley & Hein) was scored, after which the subjects brushed their teeth (2 min) with the assigned toothbrush equipped with a strain gauge. A computer set-up measured (100 Hz) and calculated the mean brushing force. After brushing, the amount of remaining plaque was assessed. The design of the study was a 4-way cross-over. The results show that with a manual brush, considerably more force is used than with the electric brushes (R = 96, I = 119, B = 146, M = 273). No significant relation between brushing force and plaque removal was demonstrated for any of the brushes.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8877657     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00601.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  11 in total

1.  Professional brushing study comparing the effectiveness of sonic brush heads with manual toothbrushes: a single blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Anna-Kristina Pelka; Tonia Nagler; Imke Hopp; Anselm Petschelt; Matthias Anton Pelka
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults--frequency, technique, duration and force.

Authors:  C Ganss; N Schlueter; S Preiss; J Klimek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Boundary lubrication by brushed salivary conditioning films and their degree of glycosylation.

Authors:  Deepak H Veeregowda; Henny C van der Mei; Joop de Vries; Mark W Rutland; Juan J Valle-Delgado; Prashant K Sharma; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Analysis of tooth brushing cycles.

Authors:  Yuki Tosaka; Kuniko Nakakura-Ohshima; Nozomi Murakami; Rikako Ishii; Issei Saitoh; Yoko Iwase; Akihiro Yoshihara; Akitsugu Ohuchi; Haruaki Hayasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Brushing force of manual and sonic toothbrushes affects dental hard tissue abrasion.

Authors:  Annette Wiegand; John Patrik Matthias Burkhard; Florin Eggmann; Thomas Attin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Scaffold-free microtissues: differences from monolayer cultures and their potential in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fabian Langenbach; Christian Naujoks; Ralf Smeets; Karin Berr; Rita Depprich; Norbert Kübler; Jörg Handschel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  A graphic tool to help consumers determine when to replace a toothbrush: a cohort study.

Authors:  Michèle Muller-Bolla; Alexandra Repetto; Ana Miriam Velly
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  Gingival abrasion and recession in manual and oscillating-rotating power brush users.

Authors:  N A M Rosema; R Adam; J M Grender; E Van der Sluijs; S C Supranoto; G A Van der Weijden
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.477

9.  Influence of Bristle Stiffness of Manual Toothbrushes on Eroded and Sound Human Dentin--An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mozhgan Bizhang; Katharina Riemer; Wolfgang H Arnold; Julia Domin; Stefan Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Efficacy of Manual and Powered Toothbrushes in Plaque Control and Gingival Inflammation: A Clinical Study among the Population of East Indian Region.

Authors:  Prasad Kulkarni; Dhirendra Kumar Singh; Mohamed Jalaluddin
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.