Literature DB >> 8877302

Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life.

M J Scherer1.   

Abstract

The results from many research efforts on the use of assistive devices are reviewed and summarized. Further, conceptual and methodological issues related to the use and abandonment of assistive technologies are discussed. Overall, this review should be helpful to professionals making device recommendations, documenting the need for a device, and assessing short- and long-term device utilization. The available literature lends support to a model of matching person and technology that considers environments of device use, characteristics of the user's preferences and expectations, and device features and functions. To ensure that assistive technologies enhance users' quality of life, future emphases should focus on consumer involvement in the selection and evaluation of appropriate assistive technology, and ways to make technologies more widely available and affordable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8877302     DOI: 10.3109/09638289609165907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  17 in total

1.  A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology.

Authors:  Emily M Agree; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

3.  Assistive technology self-management intervention for older Hispanics: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Elsa M Orellano-Colón; Stephanie Harrison-Cruz; Edith López-Lugo; Stephanie Ramos-Peraza; Alexandra Meléndez-Ortiz; Johan Ortiz-Torres; Janice Rodríguez-Marrero
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2019-06-07

4.  The impact of supported standing on well-being and quality of life.

Authors:  Birgitta Nordström; Annika Näslund; Margareta Eriksson; Lars Nyberg; Lilly Ekenberg
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Jane E Huggins; Patricia A Wren; Kirsten L Gruis
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler       Date:  2011-05-02

6.  Quality and Equity in Wheelchairs Used by Veterans.

Authors:  Larissa Myaskovsky; Shasha Gao; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kellee R Bornemann; Kelly H Burkitt; Galen E Switzer; Michael J Fine; Samuel L Phillips; David Gater; Ann M Spungen; Lynn Worobey; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version.

Authors:  Louise Demers; Michèle Monette; Micheline Descent; Jeffrey Jutai; Christina Wolfson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Personalized Telerehabilitation for a Head-mounted Low Vision Aid: A Randomized Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Marie-Céline Lorenzini; Walter Wittich
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Performance assessment in brain-computer interface-based augmentative and alternative communication.

Authors:  David E Thompson; Stefanie Blain-Moraes; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada.

Authors:  Alexandra C McKenna; Marita Kloseck; Richard Crilly; Jan Polgar
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.