Literature DB >> 8877223

Paediatric cochlear implantation: how reliable is computed tomography in assessing cochlear patency?

A P Bath1, G M O'Donoghue, I M Holland, K P Gibbin.   

Abstract

This study investigates the accuracy of pre-operative high resolution computed tomographic (CT) scans in predicting the patency of the cochlea in children undergoing cochlear implantation. The first 26 children on the Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme were reviewed. CT scans were performed utilizing 1 mm contiguous sections and these were then assessed by a neuroradiologist. In patients who had normal inner ears on CT a high degree of accuracy in predicting a patent cochlear was achieved (87%). However, in 15% of cases the degree of ossification was significantly under-estimated causing major difficulties at the time of surgery. Although high resolution CT offers great clarity and fine detail, it has its limitations. Further information may be provided by magnetic resonance imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8877223     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1993.tb00617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  3 in total

1.  Imaging Modality of Choice for Pre-Operative Cochlear Imaging: HRCT vs. MRI Temporal Bone.

Authors:  Poornima Digge; Rajendra N Solanki; Dipali C Shah; Rajesh Vishwakarma; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 2.  Diagnostic yield of computed tomography scan for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jenny X Chen; Bart Kachniarz; Jennifer J Shin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation.

Authors:  Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima Júnior; Marina David Rocha; Priscilla Vargas Walsh; Camila André Antunes; Clara Maria Dias Ferreira Calhau
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 May-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.