Literature DB >> 8877210

Lens tube vs Donaldson tube: results of a prospective study comparing a new with a conventional ventilation tube.

F Gordts1, P A Clement, M P Derde.   

Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken in 72 children comparing a new type of tympanostomy tube, the Lens tube, in one ear, and a Donaldson tube in the contra-lateral ear as a control. The average survival times of the tubes differed significantly: 17.20 months for the Lens tube, and 11.31 months for the Donaldson tube (P < 0.001). By contrast, the relapse rate (22% with the Lens tube vs 21% with the Donaldson tube) after extrusion or extraction, and the residual perforation rate (3% with the Lens tube vs 6% with the Donaldson tube) were not significantly different. Otorrhea was not significantly different either: 25% with the Lens tube vs 16% with the Donaldson tube.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8877210     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1993.tb00603.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  2 in total

1.  Timing for Removal of Asymptomatic Long-Term Ventilation Tube in Children.

Authors:  Osama G Abdel-NabyAwad
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-21

2.  In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery.

Authors:  Lawrence R Lustig; Amy Ingram; D Macy Vidrine; Andrew R Gould; Jacob W Zeiders; Randall A Ow; Christopher R Thompson; Jonathan R Moss; Ritvik Mehta; John E McClay; Amy Brenski; John Gavin; Erik H Waldman; John Ansley; David M Yen; Neil K Chadha; Michael T Murray; Frederick K Kozak; Christopher York; David M Brown; Eli Grunstein; Robert C Sprecher; Denise A Sherman; Scott R Schoem; Robert Puchalski; Susannah Hills; Audrey Calzada; Dan Harfe; Laura J England; Charles A Syms
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.