Literature DB >> 8876864

Placebo response in anxiety disorders.

M A Piercy1, J J Sramek, N M Kurtz, N R Cutler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review literature on placebo response in anxiety, to discuss sources and levels of placebo response in various anxiety disorders, and to suggest methods to prevent high placebo response rates in clinical research trials. DATA SOURCE: Data from scientific literature were identified using a MEDLINE search, and were extracted and summarized for this review. STUDY SELECTION: Representative findings were selected from clinical and epidemiologic studies, review articles, letters to the editor, book chapters, and proceedings. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from English-language reports of studies on humans were included. Only the most representative conclusions drawn from review articles were used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Anxiety disorders in general are thought to be extremely susceptible to a variety of influences, including patient characteristics and environmental variables. Reported placebo response levels in clinical studies of anxiolytics for generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder vary widely, with a tendency to be rather high, although studies in social phobia and obsessive compulsive disorder appear to have consistently low placebo response rates. Comparisons of anxiety studies with studies of other indications, such as depression, show similar overall placebo response rates. To determine efficacy, drug response rates and placebo response rates must be clearly differentiated.
CONCLUSIONS: Examination of the literature suggests that placebo response rates in studies of anxiolytics are influences by a number of factors, including both endogenous and exogenous variables. High placebo response rates may mask true drug response rates and may result from poor study design or lack of procedural standardization. The use of certain design methods may help to prevent high placebo response rates in anxiolytic clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8876864     DOI: 10.1177/106002809603000917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  7 in total

1.  Statin myopathy: incidence, risk factors, and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Kimberly A Sewright; Priscilla M Clarkson; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  INFLUENCE OF STUDY DESIGN ON TREATMENT RESPONSE IN ANXIETY DISORDER CLINICAL TRIALS.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Veronika S Bailey; Franklin R Schneier; Emily Pott; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  Feelings of Clinician-Patient Similarity and Trust Influence Pain: Evidence From Simulated Clinical Interactions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin; Steven R Anderson; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 4.  Psycho-Neuro-Endocrine-Immunological Basis of the Placebo Effect: Potential Applications beyond Pain Therapy.

Authors:  Ángel Ortega; Juan Salazar; Néstor Galban; Milagros Rojas; Daniela Ariza; Mervin Chávez-Castillo; Manuel Nava; Manuel E Riaño-Garzón; Edgar Alexis Díaz-Camargo; Oscar Medina-Ortiz; Valmore Bermúdez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Generalised anxiety disorder: treatment options.

Authors:  John J Sramek; Victoria Zarotsky; Neal R Cutler
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A Feasibility Study of Lavender Aromatherapy in an Awake Craniotomy Environment.

Authors:  Kailah Cathey; Nichole Gunyon; Nancy Chung; Nancy Conway; Diane Ames; Maharaj Singh; Amin B Kassam; Richard A Rovin
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 7.  Focusing in on the Future of Focused Ultrasound as a Translational Tool.

Authors:  Norman M Spivak; Joseph L Sanguinetti; Martin M Monti
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.