Literature DB >> 8876276

Comparison of two techniques of transrectal ultrasonography for the assessment of local extent of polypoid tumours of the rectum.

S R Rafaelsen1, O Kronborg, C Fenger, H Drue.   

Abstract

The capability of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) to differentiate between benign and malignant rectal polyps was evaluated. Digital palpation and sigmoidoscopy were followed by TRUS with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer, in a blinded design. In the second part of the study the procedure was extended with an acoustic window system (AWS), preventing compression of the polyp. Pathological examination after surgical resection was used for definitive diagnosis in 110 polyps. Digital examination detected 10 of 22 carcinomas with adenomas, compared with 19 by TRUS (P < 0.01). However, TRUS falsely indicated 20 of 49 adenomas to be carcinomas, compared with 4 out of 49 by digital examination (P < 0.001). TRUS combined with AWS detected 23 of 24 carcinomas, and gave a false positive result in only 3 of 26 benign polyps. The results suggest that the best way to discriminate between benign and malignant rectal polyps is to combine TRUS with AWS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8876276     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  2 in total

1.  Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurement of extramural tumor spread in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Søren R Rafaelsen; Chris Vagn-Hansen; Torben Sørensen; John Pløen; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Elastography and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Søren R Rafaelsen; Chris Vagn-Hansen; Torben Sørensen; Jan Lindebjerg; John Pløen; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.