Literature DB >> 8875396

Effects of partial volume and phase shift between fat and water in gradient-echo magnetic resonance-mammography.

M Peller1, M K Stehling, H Sittek, M Kessler, M Reiser.   

Abstract

The signal modulations caused by partial volume effect and phase shift between fat and water signal in gradient-echo magnetic resonance mammography (GRE MR-mammography) have been calculated. Based on this, the theoretical sensitivity and specificity of GRE MR-mammography has been investigated considering different evaluation methods for the gadolinium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA)-based signal enhancement. The results show that both in- and out-of-phase sequences suffer from partial volume effects in voxels that contain both fat and water. This can decrease sensitivity to Gd-DTPA uptake in small, fat-embedded lesions or in pathology that contains fat interspersed histologically. Additionally, out-of-phase sequences can suffer from phase cancellation effects that can further decrease their sensitivity to Gd-DTPA uptake. In the worst case signal can actually decrease during Gd-DTPA influx. Determination of enhancement relative to the baseline value can decrease the specificity of GRE MR-mammography in the out-of-phase condition and decrease the sensitivity in the in-phase condition. These effects are less pronounced when enhancement is calculated relative to fat. These effects need to be understood since Gd-DTPA uptake is the prime indicator of malignancy in MR-mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8875396     DOI: 10.1007/bf01772517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  11 in total

1.  Carcinoma of the breast imaged by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

Authors:  P Mansfield; P G Morris; R Ordidge; R E Coupland; H M Bishop; R W Blamey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  S E Harms; D P Flamig; K L Hesley; M D Meiches; R A Jensen; W P Evans; D A Savino; R V Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; V A LiVolsi; R H Troupin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; J Haustein; C Pohl; R Beck; B Lommatzsch; M Untch; W B Nathrath
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the human breast: a Phase I trial.

Authors:  S J El Yousef; R H Duchesneau
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.

Authors:  J P Stack; O M Redmond; M B Codd; P A Dervan; J T Ennis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  D Rubens; S Totterman; A K Chacko; K Kothari; W Logan-Young; J Szumowski; J H Simon; E Zachariah
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA.

Authors:  S H Heywang; D Hahn; H Schmidt; I Krischke; W Eiermann; R Bassermann; J Lissner
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations.

Authors:  S H Heywang; A Wolf; E Pruss; T Hilbertz; W Eiermann; W Permanetter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  R Damadian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.