Literature DB >> 8875040

Randomized studies in endoscopic surgery--where is the proof?

F Nagele1, B G Molnár, H O'Connor, A L Magos.   

Abstract

We have attempted to review the best available evidence for the commonest gynaecological endoscopic procedures. Controlled studies are the exception rather than the rule, and randomized studies are even rarer. Therefore, the results of large, uncontrolled series must be acknowledged. As a result, for most procedures, sufficient information is now available regarding indications, efficacy, and complications to determine their role in routine clinical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8875040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  2 in total

1.  A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists.

Authors:  Fariba Mohtashami; Peter von Dadelszen; Catherine Allaire
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  Operative laparoscopy: redefining the limits.

Authors:  C Nezhat; F Nezhat; C Nezhat; D S Seidman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.