OBJECTIVES: To determine HIV seroprevalence and incidence among various blood donor types, and to estimate the rate of window-period blood donations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort from computerized donor records. METHODS: Records were analysed from all 60,483 donors (contributing 97,464 donor units) at a public university teaching hospital blood bank in Bangkok, Thailand, from 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1993. Annual HIV incidence among 14,482 repeat donors who were HIV-seronegative on their first donation was calculated assuming equal probability of seroconversion between last seronegative and first seropositive donations. To estimate the probability of window-period donations, we assumed that the time from HIV infectivity to onset of detectable antibody was 45 days. RESULTS: In 1990, HIV incidence calculated for all repeat donors was 307 per 100,000 person-years; the probability of a window-period donation was 38 in 100,000 donations or one in 2644 donations. During 1991-1993, this probability decreased by one-half. However, one-time donors were more than twice as likely as repeat donors to be HIV-1-seropositive. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of HIV window-period blood donations among Thai repeat donors was relatively high compared with that in developed countries and was probably even higher among one-time donors. Improved donor deferral criteria are needed in Thailand.
OBJECTIVES: To determine HIV seroprevalence and incidence among various blood donor types, and to estimate the rate of window-period blood donations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort from computerized donor records. METHODS: Records were analysed from all 60,483 donors (contributing 97,464 donor units) at a public university teaching hospital blood bank in Bangkok, Thailand, from 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1993. Annual HIV incidence among 14,482 repeat donors who were HIV-seronegative on their first donation was calculated assuming equal probability of seroconversion between last seronegative and first seropositive donations. To estimate the probability of window-period donations, we assumed that the time from HIV infectivity to onset of detectable antibody was 45 days. RESULTS: In 1990, HIV incidence calculated for all repeat donors was 307 per 100,000 person-years; the probability of a window-period donation was 38 in 100,000 donations or one in 2644 donations. During 1991-1993, this probability decreased by one-half. However, one-time donors were more than twice as likely as repeat donors to be HIV-1-seropositive. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of HIV window-period blood donations among Thai repeat donors was relatively high compared with that in developed countries and was probably even higher among one-time donors. Improved donor deferral criteria are needed in Thailand.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asia; Biology; Blood Donors; Blood Supply; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diseases; Equipment And Supplies; Examinations And Diagnoses; Hiv Infections--prevention and control; Hiv Serodiagnosis; Incidence; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Measurement; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Southeastern Asia; Studies; Thailand; Time Factors; Viral Diseases