OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of atovaquone used as long-term maintenance therapy in patients with toxoplasmic encephalitis and intolerant of conventional anti-Toxoplasma therapies. DESIGN: Uncontrolled open-label study of atovaquone given through an expanded access programme; statistical analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. PATIENTS: Sixty-five patients intolerant of conventional toxoplasmic encephalitis therapies-pyrimethamine, sulphadiazine or clindamycin-received atovaquone as maintenance therapy after resolution of an acute episode of toxoplasmic encephalitis. Patients were clinically and neurologically evaluated monthly. Toxoplasmic encephalitis relapse was defined as the occurrence of neurological abnormalities, except in the case of a proven alternative diagnosis. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were treated with atovaquone 750 mg four times daily and followed up for a mean period of 1 year. Mean CD4 lymphocytes count was 29 x 10(6)/l. Prior to starting atovaquone, patients had experienced a total of 129 episodes of intolerance to conventional anti-Toxoplasma drugs. Atovaquone was used as a single anti-toxoplasmic agent in 75% of the cases. Seventeen patients (26%) experienced a toxoplasmic encephalitis relapse. Sixty-three patients (97%) were able to tolerate and continued taking atovaquone. Two patients had to discontinue therapy because of side-effects. In a multivariate analysis, only the duration of pyrimethamine-sulphadiazine therapy during the acute therapy phase of toxoplasmic encephalitis was significantly associated with a decreased risk of toxoplasmic encephalitis relapse during maintenance therapy [relative risk, 0.64 for each week of pyrimethamine-sulphadiazine; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.96; P = 0.03]. The survival probability was 70% at 1 year after the episode of toxoplasmic encephalitis (95% CI, 57-83). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that atovaquone is a well-tolerated alternative anti-Toxoplasma treatment for maintenance therapy in patients who are intolerant to conventional anti-Toxoplasma drugs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of atovaquone used as long-term maintenance therapy in patients with toxoplasmic encephalitis and intolerant of conventional anti-Toxoplasma therapies. DESIGN: Uncontrolled open-label study of atovaquone given through an expanded access programme; statistical analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. PATIENTS: Sixty-five patients intolerant of conventional toxoplasmic encephalitis therapies-pyrimethamine, sulphadiazine or clindamycin-received atovaquone as maintenance therapy after resolution of an acute episode of toxoplasmic encephalitis. Patients were clinically and neurologically evaluated monthly. Toxoplasmic encephalitis relapse was defined as the occurrence of neurological abnormalities, except in the case of a proven alternative diagnosis. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were treated with atovaquone 750 mg four times daily and followed up for a mean period of 1 year. Mean CD4 lymphocytes count was 29 x 10(6)/l. Prior to starting atovaquone, patients had experienced a total of 129 episodes of intolerance to conventional anti-Toxoplasma drugs. Atovaquone was used as a single anti-toxoplasmic agent in 75% of the cases. Seventeen patients (26%) experienced a toxoplasmic encephalitis relapse. Sixty-three patients (97%) were able to tolerate and continued taking atovaquone. Two patients had to discontinue therapy because of side-effects. In a multivariate analysis, only the duration of pyrimethamine-sulphadiazine therapy during the acute therapy phase of toxoplasmic encephalitis was significantly associated with a decreased risk of toxoplasmic encephalitis relapse during maintenance therapy [relative risk, 0.64 for each week of pyrimethamine-sulphadiazine; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.96; P = 0.03]. The survival probability was 70% at 1 year after the episode of toxoplasmic encephalitis (95% CI, 57-83). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that atovaquone is a well-tolerated alternative anti-Toxoplasma treatment for maintenance therapy in patients who are intolerant to conventional anti-Toxoplasma drugs.
Authors: Ildiko R Dunay; Markus M Heimesaat; Faris Nadiem Bushrab; Rainer H Müller; Hartmut Stocker; Keikawus Arasteh; Michael Kurowski; Rudolf Fitzner; Klaus Borner; Oliver Liesenfeld Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: S Scerra; H Coignard-Biehler; F Lanternier; F Suarez; C Charlier-Woerther; M-E Bougnoux; J Gilquin; M Lecuit; O Hermine; O Lortholary Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: O Djurković-Djaković; T Nikolić; F Robert-Gangneux; B Bobić; A Nikolić Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M Schmidt-Hieber; G Silling; E Schalk; W Heinz; J Panse; O Penack; M Christopeit; D Buchheidt; U Meyding-Lamadé; S Hähnel; H H Wolf; M Ruhnke; S Schwartz; G Maschmeyer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Andrew J Ullmann; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Hartmut Bertz; Werner J Heinz; Michael Kiehl; William Krüger; Sabine Mousset; Stefan Neuburger; Silke Neumann; Olaf Penack; Gerda Silling; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Hermann Einsele; Georg Maschmeyer Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 3.673