Literature DB >> 8874553

A step-wise protocol for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the neurosurgical intensive care unit.

J Hatton1, W Y Lu, D H Rhoney, P A Tibbs, R J Dempsey, B Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical patients are at risk for stress induced gastric erosion. Clinical criteria for monitoring stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) efficacy and predicting clinical bleeding are limited. SUP in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NSICU) was evaluated utilizing a multidisciplinary quality assurance program with defined criteria for therapy.
METHODS: All patients admitted to the NSICU were managed using this protocol. Therapy was initiated with a single drug (cimetidine 300 mg IV every 6 hours, or continuous infusion up to 2400 mg/day) in 136 evaluable cases. Combination therapy was implemented if continued gastric pH < 4 and guaiac positive aspirates occurred (N = 45).
RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between low gastric pH values and both GCS < 8 (P < or = 0.01) and length of ventilatory support (P < or = 0.005). Single agent therapy was more effective in patients with GCS > or = 8 (P < or = 0.001). Endoscopy was performed in 25 patients. No patient with GCS < 8 had pathologic lesions. The presence of asymptomatic gastrointestinal lesions was higher in patients requiring longer ventilatory support (P < or = 0.001) and intensive care unit stay (P < or = 0.0001). Patients requiring pentobarbital and vasopressors had statistically higher rates of clinical bleeding (P < 0.05). Patients with GCS < 8 had increased rates of pneumonia (P < or = 0.005) with a higher pneumonia rate when treated with combination therapy (P < or = 0.05). Overall, the incidence of clinical bleeding was 3.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: This protocol was effective for prospective monitoring of SUP efficacy and limited multiple drug therapy to patients at risk for clinical bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874553     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00245-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  4 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal prophylaxis in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Clemens M Schirmer; Joshua Kornbluth; Carl B Heilman; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Alicia J Mangram; Joseph F Sucher; Victor Zach
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Intracerebral hemorrhage specific intensity of care quality metrics.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Adherence to a stress ulcer prophylaxis protocol by critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yuri de Albuquerque Pessoa Dos Santos; Mauricio Staib Younes-Ibrahim; Lucas Lonardoni Crozatti; Dante Raglione; Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Junior; Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen; Leandro Utino Taniguchi; Marcelo Park; Pedro Vitale Mendes
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020-05-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.