Literature DB >> 8873435

Contemporary criteria for cadaveric organ donation in renal transplantation: the need for better selection parameters.

R J Taylor1, J S Engelsgjerd.   

Abstract

A major problem facing transplantation is the disparity between the availability of cadaver donors and the number of recipients awaiting transplantation. Efforts to deal with this issue have involved the use of "marginal donors." Results obtained using these organs have often been significantly worse at 1 and 3 years of follow-up. The problem of how to select and utilize these donors is of critical importance to both patients and society. Current criteria available for assessing cadaver donors are based on ideal donors. Although these appear adequate for predicting the results for the ideal donor, they are not adequate for assessing results for marginal donors. New criteria are of critical importance for better utilization of these organs. The purpose of this review is to examine the current criteria for ideal and marginal donors, review the critical issues to be clarified, and discuss options for improvement results in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873435     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  19 in total

1.  The influence of cold ischemia and donor age on renal allograft outcome in the cyclosporine era.

Authors:  T V Cacciarelli; N Sumrani; A DiBenedetto; J H Hong; B G Sommer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  High-risk donors: diabetics, the elderly, and others.

Authors:  J W Alexander
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Long-term follow-up of recipients of cadaver kidney allografts from elderly donors.

Authors:  J Lloveras; M Arias; J M Puig; R Escallada; M Mir; J G Cotorruelo; A L de Francisco; J Masramon
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  HLA matching determines susceptibility to harmful effects of delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  D A Shoskes; E E Hodge; M Goormastic; D A Goldfarb; A C Novick
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Remarkable accuracy of a new cadaveric donor evaluation tool.

Authors:  A L Friedman; H M Nathan; S E Smolinski
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. The multivariate analysis.

Authors:  C Troppmann; K J Gillingham; E Benedetti; P S Almond; R W Gruessner; J S Najarian; A J Matas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  The hyperfiltration hypothesis in human renal transplantation.

Authors:  P I Terasaki; H Koyama; J M Cecka; D W Gjertson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1994-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.

Authors:  J M Cecka; P I Terasaki
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1993

9.  Unrelated living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  J P Squifflet; Y Pirson; A Poncelet; P Gianello; G P Alexandre
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.782

10.  The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1991.

Authors:  J M Cecka; P I Terasaki
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1991
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.