Literature DB >> 8873030

Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms.

S Pohlman1, K A Powell, N A Obuchowski, W A Chilcote, S Grundfest-Broniatowski.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop a technique to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions in secondarily digitized mammograms. A set of 51 mammograms (two views/patient) containing lesions of known pathology were evaluated using six different morphological descriptors: circularity, mu R/sigma R (where mu R = mean radial distance of tumor boundary, sigma R = standard deviation); compactness, P2/A (where P = perimeter length of tumor boundary and A = area of the tumor); normalized moment classifier; fractal dimension; and a tumor boundary roughness (TBR) measurement (the number of angles in the tumor boundary with more than one boundary point divided by the total number of angles in the boundary). The lesion was segmented from the surrounding background using an adaptive region growing technique. Ninety-seven percent of the lesions were segmented using this approach. An ROC analysis was performed for each parameter and the results of this analysis were compared to each other and to those obtained from a subjective review by two board-certified radiologists who specialize in mammography. The results of the analysis indicate that all six parameters are diagnostic for malignancy with areas under their ROC curves ranging from 0.759 to 0.928. We observed a trend towards increased specificity at low false-negative rates (0.01 and 0.001) with the TBR measurement. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of a classification model based on this parameter was similar to that of the subjective reviewers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873030     DOI: 10.1118/1.597707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Multilevel learning-based segmentation of ill-defined and spiculated masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Yimo Tao; Shih-Chung B Lo; Matthew T Freedman; Erini Makariou; Jianhua Xuan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Thanh M Nguyen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Algorithmic three-dimensional analysis of tumor shape in MRI improves prognosis of survival in glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nicholas Czarnek; Kal Clark; Katherine B Peters; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Radiogenomics of lower-grade glioma: algorithmically-assessed tumor shape is associated with tumor genomic subtypes and patient outcomes in a multi-institutional study with The Cancer Genome Atlas data.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Kal Clark; Nicholas M Czarnek; Parisa Shamsesfandabadi; Katherine B Peters; Ashirbani Saha
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions.

Authors:  Alan Penn; Scott Thompson; Rachel Brem; Constance Lehman; Paul Weatherall; Mitchell Schnall; Gillian Newstead; Emily Conant; Susan Ascher; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Visual perception of multilocular radiolucent mandibular lesions quantified by morphometric analysis.

Authors:  R Raitz; A L V Rodrigues; V C R Reis; R C Borra
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Can algorithmically assessed MRI features predict which patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are upstaged to invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Michael R Harowicz; Ashirbani Saha; Lars J Grimm; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; E Shelley Hwang; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.

Authors:  Denise Guliato; Juliano D de Carvalho; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Sérgio A Santiago
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Automated biochemical, morphological, and organizational assessment of precancerous changes from endogenous two-photon fluorescence images.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levitt; Margaret E McLaughlin-Drubin; Karl Münger; Irene Georgakoudi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An agent-based model of triple-negative breast cancer: the interplay between chemokine receptor CCR5 expression, cancer stem cells, and hypoxia.

Authors:  Kerri-Ann Norton; Travis Wallace; Niranjan B Pandey; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2017-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.