Literature DB >> 8872329

FISH detection of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in early onset breast cancer.

W R Xing1, K W Gilchrist, C P Harris, W Samson, L F Meisner.   

Abstract

HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) gene amplification based on Southern blotting or immunohistochemistry has been shown to be predictive of poor outcome in breast cancer occurring in women over 40, but there is little data on the role of HER-2/neu in young women with breast cancer, many of whom may have inherited BRCA1 or other predisposing genes. The present study used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on archival specimens of breast cancer from 37 women under the age of 40 to evaluate the role of HER-2/neu amplification in this cohort, and to also evaluate the efficacy of FISH for quantifying amplification. The frequency of primary tumors with a greater than fourfold increase in gene copy number was found to be 38%, which is similar to the frequency of amplification reported in Southern blot studies in older women. However, the greater sensitivity of FISH enabled detection of low level amplification (more than 2 but less than 8 gene copies), which was found in an additional 30% of the tumors. Patients with low level amplification demonstrated a 54% recurrence rate, compared to 86% in those with high amplification and 17% in those with no amplification. HER-2/neu amplification appeared to be more prognostic of recurrence than nodal status, with 45% of node negative tumors recurring compared to 62% of those which were node positive, nor was tumor size predictive of recurrence in this cohort since tumors of 2 cm or less recurred in 44% of cases compared to 57% of those larger than 2 cm. Thus, this study demonstrates that FISH is a reproducible and sensitive technique for detecting HER-2/neu amplification, and that amplification of the oncogene is the strongest independent indicator of recurrence of breast cancer in young women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8872329     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  38 in total

1.  Is DNA ploidy an independent prognostic indicator in infiltrative node-negative breast adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  S Keyhani-Rofagha; R V O'Toole; W B Farrar; B Sickle-Santanello; J DeCenzo; D Young
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Flow cytometric (DNA content and S-phase fraction) analysis of breast cancer.

Authors:  J G Batsakis; N Sneige; A K el-Naggar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Cell biological factors associated with the response of breast cancer to systemic treatment.

Authors:  J G Klijn; E M Berns; M Bontenbal; J Foekens
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Her-2/neu expression in node-negative breast cancer: direct tissue quantitation by computerized image analysis and association of overexpression with increased risk of recurrent disease.

Authors:  M F Press; M C Pike; V R Chazin; G Hung; J A Udove; M Markowicz; J Danyluk; W Godolphin; M Sliwkowski; R Akita
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Detection of aneuploidy and possible deletion in paraffin-embedded rhabdomyosarcoma cells with FISH.

Authors:  W Lee; K Han; C P Harris; L F Meisner
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1993-07-15

6.  DNA ploidy and the percentage of cells in S-phase as prognostic factors for women with lymph node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  T E Witzig; J N Ingle; S S Cha; D J Schaid; R L Tabery; L E Wold; C Grant; N J Gonchoroff; J A Katzmann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A de la Rochefordiere; B Asselain; F Campana; S M Scholl; J Fenton; J R Vilcoq; J C Durand; P Pouillart; H Magdelenat; A Fourquet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  High DNA content and prognosis in lymph node positive breast cancer. A case control study by the University of Leiden and ECOG. (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group).

Authors:  K W Gilchrist; R Gray; A M van Driel-Kulker; W E Mesker; J J Ploem-Zaaijer; J S Ploem; S G Taylor; D C Tormey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Expression of HER-2/neu oncoprotein in human breast cancer: a comparison of immunohistochemical and western blot techniques.

Authors:  R Molina; D R Ciocca; A K Tandon; D C Allred; G M Clark; G C Chamness; W J Gullick; W L McGuire
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  H B Muss; A D Thor; D A Berry; T Kute; E T Liu; F Koerner; C T Cirrincione; D R Budman; W C Wood; M Barcos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical targeting of mutated and wild-type protein tyrosine kinases in cancer.

Authors:  Justin M Drake; John K Lee; Owen N Witte
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The art of healing broken hearts in breast cancer patients: Trastuzumab and heart failure.

Authors:  Jonathan R Walker; Pawan K Singal; Davinder S Jassal
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Targeted therapeutic options and future perspectives for HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiani Wang; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2019-09-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.