Literature DB >> 8870543

Calibration of measures for psychotherapy outcome studies.

L Sechrest1, P McKnight, K McKnight.   

Abstract

Many findings in psychology, including those in psychotherapy, lack interpretability because measures are not in any meaningful metric. Measures need to be calibrated so as to endow them with inherent meaning. In particular, it is important to calibrate measures against behaviors and real events in people's lives. Approaches to calibrating measures include calibration against direct personal experience, against cross-experiential equivalents, and against cross-modal equivalents, to reflect empirically established behavioral implications as well as just noticeable differences in behavior or between people. Psychological measures may never be as closely calibrated as those for physical properties, but wider reporting of unstandardized regression equations would be of great help. Psychological measures also need to be calibrated against each other so as to permit easy transformations of values or substitutions of measures. Finally, greater standardization of measures is recommended so as to produce better bases for calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8870543     DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.10.1065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  20 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary.

Authors:  F Virginia Wright
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  The relationship between symptomatic changes and perceived improvement among patients treated in Brazilian community mental health services.

Authors:  Mário César Rezende Andrade; Marina Bandeira; Michel Perreault; Antonio Paulo Angélico; Marcos Santos de Oliveira
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2012-09

3.  Reliability and validity of the BASIS-24 Mental Health Survey for Whites, African-Americans, and Latinos.

Authors:  Susan V Eisen; Mariana Gerena; Gayatri Ranganathan; David Esch; Thomas Idiculla
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Improving risk adjustment of self-reported mental health outcomes.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Sharmila Chatterjee; Mark E Glickman; Avron Spiro; Pradipta Seal; Susan V Eisen
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): A Method for the Naturalistic Observation of Daily Social Behavior.

Authors:  Matthias R Mehl
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-06

6.  The incremental value of self-reported mental health measures in predicting functional outcomes of veterans.

Authors:  Susan V Eisen; Kathryn A Bottonari; Mark E Glickman; Avron Spiro; Mark R Schultz; Lawrence Herz; Robert Rosenheck; Ethan S Rofman
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 7.  "It's Valid and Reliable" Is Not Enough: Critical Appraisal of Reporting of Measures in Trials Evaluating Patient Decision Aids.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Daniel D Matlock; Celia E Wills; Mary Ropka; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Dawn Stacey; ChirkJenn Ng; Carrie Levin; Joanne Lally; Cornelia M Borkhoff; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference.

Authors:  Leah McClimans
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-12

9.  Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping.

Authors:  Andrea Petróczi; Eugene V Aidman; Iltaf Hussain; Nawed Deshmukh; Tamás Nepusz; Martina Uvacsek; Miklós Tóth; James Barker; Declan P Naughton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Athletic trainers' and physical therapists' perceptions of the effectiveness of psychological skills within sport injury rehabilitation programs.

Authors:  J Jordan Hamson-Utley; Scott Martin; Jason Walters
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.