Literature DB >> 8870304

Hospital utilization in Ontario and the United States: the impact of socioeconomic status and health status.

S J Katz1, T P Hofer, W G Manning.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared hospital use in Ontario and the United States for persons with different socioeconomic and health status.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the 1990 Ontario Health Survey and the 1990 National Health Interview Survey.
RESULTS: Admission rates averaged 31% higher in Ontario than in the United States, but international differences varied markedly across income and health status. At each level of health status, poor Canadians received one quarter to one third more admissions than their counterparts in the United States. However, higher income Canadians reporting excellent to good health had 50% more admissions than Americans, whereas those reporting fair or poor health had 10% fewer admissions.
CONCLUSIONS: The observation that higher income sick persons receive less hospital care in Ontario than in the U.S. provides support at the population level for what has been observed for specific technologies. This represents, in part, a redistribution of inpatient care to those most vulnerable to illness, such as the poor, who receive substantially more hospital care in Ontario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8870304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  9 in total

1.  A structural equation modeling approach to examining the predictive power of determinants of individuals' health expenditures.

Authors:  Jin-Yuan Chern; Thomas T H Wan; James W Begun
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Social, prognostic, and therapeutic factors associated with cancer survival: a population-based study in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Isaac N Luginaah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2003-11

3.  An international comparison of cancer survival: advantage of Toronto's poor over the near poor of Detroit.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; E Laukkanen; G Fehringer; N L Richter
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Impact of enhanced detection on the increase in thyroid cancer incidence in the United States: review of incidence trends by socioeconomic status within the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry, 1980-2008.

Authors:  Nan Li; Xianglin L Du; Lorraine R Reitzel; Li Xu; Erich M Sturgis
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Access to care and outcomes for neuroendocrine tumours: does socioeconomic status matter?

Authors:  J Hallet; N G Coburn; S Singh; K Beyfuss; S Koujanian; N Liu; C H L Law
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Association of Family Income with Health Indices and Healthcare Utilization in a Large Sample of Residents in Northern Greece.

Authors:  Orestia Zissimopoulou; Eleni Leontidou; Dimitrios Tsiptsios; Apostolos Manolis; Dimitrios Ioannides; Ioanna Trypsiani; Paschalis Steiropoulos; Theodoros C Constantinidis; Gregory Tripsianis; Evangelia Nena
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2020-12

7.  Association of Household Income Level and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Barret Rush; Katie Wiskar; Leo Anthony Celi; Keith R Walley; James A Russell; Robert C McDermid; John H Boyd
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.510

8.  Socioeconomic disparities in health care use: Does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health?

Authors:  P J Veugelers; A M Yip
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Health Care Utilization by Canadian Women.

Authors:  Arminée Kazanjian; Denise Morettin; Robert Cho
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.