Literature DB >> 8869102

Immunoassays (ELISA) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA): report of an EORTC/BIOMED-1 workshop.

T J Benraad1, J Geurts-Moespot, J Grøndahl-Hansen, M Schmitt, J J Heuvel, J H de Witte, J A Foekens, R E Leake, N Brünner, C G Sweep.   

Abstract

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is considered to play a key role in the process of invasion and metastasis. In several independent studies, in a variety of cancer types (e.g. of the breast, colon, stomach, lung, ovary), high antigen levels of uPA in tumour extracts have been associated with rapid disease progression. In these studies, different sets of antibodies and standards (often as commercially available uPA ELISA kits) have been used. The standards provided with the different uPA ELISA kits are different from each other in both composition and source. In addition, the different uPA ELISA kits use antibodies which differ in specificity and affinity for the various forms of uPA including pro-uPA, HMW-uPA, LMW-uPA, the aminoterminal fragment (ATF) and complexes with inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2) and the receptor (uPAR). Further, the composition of tumour tissue extraction buffers differ significantly among the published studies. Thus, it is not surprising that the ranges of cytosolic uPA levels reported differ considerably even when measured within the same tumour type. These discrepancies led the EORTC Receptor and Biomarker Study Group, in conjunction with the BIOMED-1 consortium on 'Clinical Relevance of Proteases in Tumour Invasion and Metastasis', to organise a workshop to study the characteristics associated with six different uPA immunoassays (ELISA) used in clinical studies reported in the literature. Although the absolute uPA antigen values measured with the respective uPA ELISA kits differed, high correlations were obtained for any two of the four uPA ELISA kits finally applied to sets of breast cancer cytosol preparations. The preparations used at present as standards in the various uPA ELISA kits are not representative of actual human breast cancer cytosols. Thus absolute standardisation is only possible by using a common reference sample (breast cancer cytosol) and similarly composed ELISA uPA kits. Then it will be possible to generate comparable data on clinical tissue as well as to check for batch-to-batch variations within particular ELISA kits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8869102     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00118-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

1.  Detecting in vivo urokinase plasminogen activator activity with a catalyCEST MRI contrast agent.

Authors:  Sanhita Sinharay; Christine M Howison; Amanda F Baker; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Fibrinolytic System and Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Niaz Mahmood; Shafaat A Rabbani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  TFRC and ACTB as the best reference genes to quantify Urokinase Plasminogen Activator in breast cancer.

Authors:  Keivan Majidzadeh-A; Rezvan Esmaeili; Nasrin Abdoli
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-06-25

4.  Prognostic significance of urokinase plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 mRNA expression in lymph node- and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Philippe Leissner; Thibault Verjat; Thomas Bachelot; Malick Paye; Alexander Krause; Alain Puisieux; Bruno Mougin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor (PAI-1) in cytosols and pellet extracts derived from 892 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J H de Witte; C G Sweep; J G Klijn; N Grebenschikov; H A Peters; M P Look; T H van Tienoven; J J Heuvel; W L van Putten; T J Benraad; J A Foekens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Prognostic value of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and its complex with the type-1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in breast cancer.

Authors:  J H de Witte; C G Sweep; J G Klijn; N Grebenschikov; H A Peters; M P Look; T H van Tienoven; J J Heuvel; J Bolt-De Vries; T J Benraad; J A Foekens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Risk-group discrimination in node-negative breast cancer using invasion and proliferation markers: 6-year median follow-up.

Authors:  N Harbeck; P Dettmar; C Thomssen; U Berger; K Ulm; R Kates; H Höfler; F Jänicke; H Graeff; M Schmitt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  uPA and PAI-1 as biomarkers in breast cancer: validated for clinical use in level-of-evidence-1 studies.

Authors:  Michael J Duffy; Patricia M McGowan; Nadia Harbeck; Christoph Thomssen; Manfred Schmitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods.

Authors:  C Bouchet; F Spyratos; K Hacène; L Durcos; V Bécette; J Oglobine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  External quality assessment of trans-European multicentre antigen determinations (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type 1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in human breast cancer tissue extracts.

Authors:  C G Sweep; J Geurts-Moespot; N Grebenschikov; J H de Witte; J J Heuvel; M Schmitt; M J Duffy; F Jänicke; M D Kramer; J A Foekens; N Brünner; G Brugal; A N Pedersen; T J Benraad
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.