Literature DB >> 8869094

Humoral immune response to polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC-1) in patients with benign and malignant breast tumours.

S von Mensdorff-Pouilly1, M M Gourevitch, P Kenemans, A A Verstraeten, S V Litvinov, G J van Kamp, S Meijer, J Vermorken, J Hilgers.   

Abstract

To investigate the clinical significance of an immune response to the MUC-1 encoded polymorphic epithelial mucin (PEM) breast cancer, circulating immune complexes containing PEM (PEM.CIC) were measured in sera from 96 healthy women, in pretreatment serum samples from 40 patients with benign breast tumours and from 140 patients with breast cancer and in serum samples from 61 breast cancer patients with recurrent or progressive disease. PEM.CIC were measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunoassay, and PEM serum levels were measured with CA 15.3 IRMA (Centocor Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.). Cut-off levels used for PEM.CIC and CA 15.3 were 120 Optical Density Units (O.D.) x 10(3) and 30 U/ml, respectively. In benign tumours, positivity for PEM.CIC was 37.5% (15/40). 36 of the 140 patients (25.7%) in the breast cancer pretreatment group had elevated PEM.CIC values. In patients with advanced metastatic disease, positivity for PEM.CIC was 18% (11/61). PEM.CIC was elevated in 32% (24/74) of node-negative patients, but only in 20% (12/59) of node-positive patients and absolute values were higher in node-negative patients (Mann-Whitney U test, two-tailed P = 0.0168). There was an inverse correlation between positivity for PEM.CIC and extent of disease: while 3 of the 6 patients with a carcinoma in situ were positive, only 1 of the 15 patients with more than five nodes involved had elevated levels of PEM.CIC. All 7 patients with distant metastases at first diagnosis were PEM.CIC negative. 28 out of 133 patients had a recurrence during the observation period (median 55 months, range 27-84 months). 23 of these 28 patients (82%) were PEM.CIC negative at the moment of first diagnosis. None of the patients with pretreatment elevation of both PEM.CIC and CA 15.3 (n = 13) relapsed. Our preliminary clinical results suggest that a humoral immune response to PEM protects against disease progression, and further support the idea of using synthetic peptides or glycopeptides containing the immunogenic core of the mucin as cancer vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8869094     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00048-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  27 in total

1.  Anti-MUC1 antibodies and ovarian cancer risk: prospective data from the Nurses' Health Studies.

Authors:  Simone P Pinheiro; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger; Bernard A Rosner; John R McKolanis; Olivera J Finn; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Detection of circulating anti-mucin 1 (MUC1) antibodies in breast tumor patients by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a recombinant MUC1 protein containing six tandem repeats and expressed in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yan Tang; Li Wang; Peiyin Zhang; Hongfei Wei; Rui Gao; Xinming Liu; Yongli Yu; Liying Wang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-09-28

3.  Expression of B7.1 in a MUC1-expressing mouse mammary epithelial tumour cell line inhibits tumorigenicity but does not induce autoimmunity in MUC1 transgenic mice.

Authors:  M Smith; J M Burchell; R Graham; E P Cohen; J Taylor-Papadimitriou
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Antibody and T cell responses of patients with adenocarcinoma immunized with mannan-MUC1 fusion protein.

Authors:  V Karanikas; L A Hwang; J Pearson; C S Ong; V Apostolopoulos; H Vaughan; P X Xing; G Jamieson; G Pietersz; B Tait; R Broadbent; G Thynne; I F McKenzie
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Immunization with a vaccine that combines the expression of MUC1 and B7 co-stimulatory molecules prolongs the survival of mice and delays the appearance of mouse mammary tumors.

Authors:  Vitaly Vasilevko; Anahit Ghochikyan; Nadya Sadzikava; Irina Petrushina; Mike Tran; Edward P Cohen; Patrick J Kesslak; David H Cribbs; Garth L Nicolson; Michael G Agadjanyan
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Upregulated expression of complement inhibitory proteins on bladder cancer cells and anti-MUC1 antibody immune selection.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Varela; Carl Atkinson; Robert Woolson; Thomas E Keane; Stephen Tomlinson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ettie Piura; Benjamin Piura
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 8.  Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities.

Authors:  Michael A Tainsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-05-04

Review 9.  The fundamental flaws of immunoassays and potential solutions using tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Andrew N Hoofnagle; Mark H Wener
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Breast cancer humoral immune response: involvement of Lewis y through the detection of circulating immune complexes and association with Mucin 1 (MUC1).

Authors:  Marina Isla Larrain; Sandra Demichelis; Marina Crespo; Ezequiel Lacunza; Alberto Barbera; Aldo Cretón; Francisco Terrier; Amada Segal-Eiras; María Virginia Croce
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.