Literature DB >> 8869050

Clinicopathological heterogeneity in the classification of mild head injury.

V P Culotta1, M E Sementilli, K Gerold, C C Watts.   

Abstract

Research examining the neurobehavioral outcome after mild head injury has yielded inconsistent and contradictory findings. Such findings have been attributed to a variety of methodological weaknesses, such as failure to consider the preinjury status of the patient, lack of control groups, and variability in outcome time points. However, few researchers have examined the adequacy of the current diagnostic criteria. A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15 is one of the primary criteria in the classification of mild head injury. We propose that the use of GCS Scores 13 to 15 permits excessive heterogeneity in injury severity and contributes to variability in neurobehavioral outcome. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of admission GCS scores to variables indicative of injury severity. The case records of 3370 patients consecutively admitted to a Level I trauma center with nonmissile head injuries, positive loss of consciousness, and admission GCS scores of 13 to 15 were reviewed. The frequency of positive computed tomographic scan findings and the need for neurosurgical intervention within the first 24 hours were recorded. A chi 2 analysis revealed statistically significant differences between the frequency of positive computed tomographic scans and the need for neurosurgical intervention in patients with GCS scores of 13 versus 14, 14 versus 15, and 13 versus 15. These results indicate significant differences in injury severity among patients with admission GCS scores of 13 to 15. The implicit assumption of clinicopathological homogeneity among patients with such scores is challenged by these data. This study demonstrates the need for more precise research diagnostic criteria in the study of neurobehavioral outcome after mild head injury. These findings also provide compelling evidence for the re-examination of the classification of mild head injury. Serious consideration must be given to the segregation of patients with GCS scores of 15 from those with scores of 14 and 13.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8869050     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199602000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  22 in total

Review 1.  Management of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a neuropsychological review from injury through recovery.

Authors:  Michael W Kirkwood; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Christopher Randolph; Michael McCrea; Vicki A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Head CT evaluation in clinically stable motor vehicle collision patients.

Authors:  Rahul Gupta; Margaret D Taha; Kathleen McCarroll; Holly Bair; Jinglan Wu
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-07-26

Review 3.  Mild head injury: reliability of early computed tomographic findings in triage for admission.

Authors:  J-L af Geijerstam; M Britton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury?

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; V J Easton; P Statham
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  The significance of skull fracture in mild head trauma differs between children and adults.

Authors:  M A Muñoz-Sánchez; F Murillo-Cabezas; A Cayuela; J M Flores-Cordero; M D Rincón-Ferrari; R Amaya-Villar; A Fornelino
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Mild head injury and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.

Authors:  Veronique Chasle; Laurent Riffaud; Romain Longuet; Marie Martineau-Curt; Yann Collet; Luc Le Fournier; Patrick Pladys
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Sex differences in outcome after mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bazarian; Brian Blyth; Sohug Mookerjee; Hua He; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: a 3D multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; Assaf Tal; James S Babb; Yvonne W Lui; Robert I Grossman; Oded Gonen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Mild head injury: observation or computed tomography? Economic aspects by literature review and decision analysis.

Authors:  J L Af Geijerstam; M Britton; L A Marké
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Proton MR spectroscopy correlates diffuse axonal abnormalities with post-concussive symptoms in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; Assaf Tal; James S Babb; Joseph Reaume; Tamara Bushnik; Teresa A Ashman; Steven Flanagan; Robert I Grossman; Oded Gonen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.