Literature DB >> 8868226

Field measurement of dermal soil loading attributable to various activities: implications for exposure assessment.

J C Kissel1, K Y Richter, R A Fenske.   

Abstract

Estimates of soil adherence to skin are required for assessment of dermal exposures to contaminants in soils. Previously available estimates depend heavily on indirect measurements and/or artificial activities and reflect sampling of hands only. Results are presented here from direct measurement of soil loading on skin surfaces of volunteers before and after normal occupational and recreational activities that might reasonably be expected to lead to soil contact. Skin surfaces assayed included hands, forearms, lower legs, faces and/or feet. Observed hand loadings vary over five orders of magnitude (roughly from 10(-3) to 10(2) mg/cm2) and are dependent upon type of activity. Hand loadings within the current default range of 0.2 to 1.0 mg/cm2 were produced by activities providing opportunity for relatively vigorous soil contact (rugby, farming). Loadings less than 0.2 mg/cm2 were found on hands following activities presenting less opportunity for direct soil contact (soccer, professional grounds maintenance) and on other body parts under many conditions. The default range does not, however, represent a worst case. Children playing in mud on the shore of a lake generated geometric mean loadings well in excess of 1 mg/cm2 on hands, arms, legs, and feet. Post-activity average loadings on hands were typically higher than average loadings on other body parts resulting from the same activity. Hand data from limited activities cannot, however, be used to conservatively predict loadings that might occur on other body surfaces without regard to activity since non-hand loadings attributable to higher contact activities exceeded hand loadings resulting from lower contact activities. Differences between pre- and post-activity loadings also demonstrate that dermal contact with soil is episodic. Typical background (pre-activity) geometric mean loadings appear to be on the order of 10(-2) mg/cm2 or less. Because exposures are activity dependent, quantification of dermal exposure to soil will remain inadequate until data describing relevant human behavior (type of activity, frequency, duration including interval before bathing, clothing worn, etc.) are generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8868226     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01441.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  12 in total

1.  Determination of hand soil loading, soil transfer, and particle size variations after hand-pressing and hand-mouthing activities.

Authors:  Hsing-Cheng Hsi; Ching-Yao Hu; Ming-Chien Tsou; Han-Jung Hu; Halûk Özkaynak; Karen Bradham; Zeng-Yei Hseu; Winston Dang; Ling-Chu Chien
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the soils of a densely populated region and associated human health risks: the Campania Plain (Southern Italy) case study.

Authors:  Stefano Albanese; Barbara Fontaine; Wei Chen; Annamaria Lima; Claudia Cannatelli; Alessandro Piccolo; Shihua Qi; Menghan Wang; Benedetto De Vivo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  Changes in children's exposure as a function of age and the relevance of age definitions for exposure and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-07-20

4.  Investigating relationships between biomarkers of exposure and environmental copper and manganese levels in house dusts from a Portuguese industrial city.

Authors:  A P Reis; S Costa; I Santos; C Patinha; Y Noack; J Wragg; M Cave; A J Sousa
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 5.  Dust: a metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization.

Authors:  Paul J Lioy; Natalie C G Freeman; James R Millette
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Children's exposure assessment: a review of factors influencing Children's exposure, and the data available to characterize and assess that exposure.

Authors:  E A Cohen Hubal; L S Sheldon; J M Burke; T R McCurdy; M R Berry; M L Rigas; V G Zartarian; N C Freeman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Particle transfer and adherence to human skin compared with cotton glove and pre-moistened polyvinyl alcohol exposure sampling substrates.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Eleanor E Wade; Robert B Lawrence; Elizabeth D Arnold; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.269

8.  Risk remaining from fine particle contaminants after vacuum cleaning of hard floor surfaces.

Authors:  Andrew Hunt; David L Johnson; J Brooks; Daniel A Griffith
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.898

9.  Cadmium-related mortality and long-term secular trends in the cadmium body burden of an environmentally exposed population.

Authors:  Tim S Nawrot; Etienne Van Hecke; Lutgarde Thijs; Tom Richart; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Yu Jin; Jaco Vangronsveld; Harry A Roels; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Risk Assessment for Children Exposed to Beach Sands Impacted by Oil Spill Chemicals.

Authors:  Jennifer C Black; Jennifer N Welday; Brian Buckley; Alesia Ferguson; Patrick L Gurian; Kristina D Mena; Ill Yang; Elizabeth McCandlish; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.