Literature DB >> 8867754

Effect of window size on detection acuity and resolution acuity for sinusoidal gratings in central and peripheral vision.

R S Anderson1, D W Evans, L N Thibos.   

Abstract

Detection and resolution of square patches of sinusoidal gratings were measured in central and peripheral vision (30 degrees horizontal temporal visual field) for high-contrast gratings as a function of the number of cycles in the stimulus. We determined performance in a forced-choice paradigm for a fixed number of stimulus cycles by arranging for stimulus diameter to vary inversely with spatial frequency. For both psychophysical tasks and for both target locations, the psychometric function relating performance to log spatial frequency shifted to higher frequencies without changing slope significantly as the number of cycles in the stimulus was increased. Thus the entire effect could be captured by an analysis of spatial acuity, which increased with increasing number of grating cycles over the range 0.5-6 cycles but remained constant over the range 6-14 cycles. In the central field, resolution acuity and detection acuity were equal regardless of the number of cycles in the stimulus. In the peripheral field, detection acuity exceeded resolution acuity and perceptual aliasing occurred for stimuli in the range 1-14 cycles. From this result we conclude that resolution acuity is sampling limited in the periphery, provided that the stimulus contains at least one full cycle of the grating. Essential features of the results could be accounted for by Fourier analysis of the stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8867754     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.13.000697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  6 in total

1.  Effect of sampling array irregularity and window size on the discrimination of sampled gratings.

Authors:  David W Evans; Yizhong Wang; Kevin M Haggerty; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Optimizing the rapid measurement of detection thresholds in infants.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Sarah Kalwarowsky; Oliver J Braddick; Janette Atkinson; Marko Nardini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Parafoveal letter recognition at reduced contrast in normal aging and in patients with risk factors for AMD.

Authors:  Gesa Astrid Hahn; Andre Messias; Manfred Mackeben; Klaus Dietz; Karin Horwath; Lea Hyvärinen; Markku Leinonen; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Choice of Grating Orientation for Evaluation of Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Abinaya Priya Venkataraman; Simon Winter; Robert Rosén; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field.

Authors:  Michael O Wilkinson; Roger S Anderson; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Resolution acuity across the visual field for mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Authors:  Michael O Wilkinson; Roger S Anderson; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.