Literature DB >> 8867561

Determinants of the white-coat effect in hypertensive subjects.

G A Mansoor1, E J McCabe, W B White.   

Abstract

To determine the magnitude and the relationships of the difference between office and awake ambulatory blood pressures (BP) (white-coat effect) in ambulatory hypertensive patients, 64 consecutive patients referred to the ambulatory BP monitoring laboratory were studied. All subjects were evaluated prospectively by study nurse, study doctor, and ambulatory BP measurements. Order of measurements was randomized and observers were blinded to each others readings. No differences were found in the white-coat effects among study nurse (22/14 +/- 20/9 mm Hg), study doctor (27/12 +/- 20/10 mm Hg) and referring doctor (19/11 +/- 18/10 mm Hg). Similarly, female and male patients exhibited similar white-coat effects on the day of ambulatory monitoring. Older patients (> or = 65 years) displayed higher mean systolic white-coat effects than younger patients (29 +/- 18 mm Hg vs 19 +/- 19 mm Hg, P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis using the mean average systolic white-coat effect as the dependent variable and age, gender, treatment status, body mass index (BMI) and duration of hypertension as independent variables showed a significant independent role for age. In contrast, no clinical correlates of the diastolic white-coat effect were found. Older patients are more likely to display a systolic white-coat effect in the medical care environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8867561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  8 in total

Review 1.  Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Isabella A Horvath; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Prevalence and predictors of white-coat response in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  M B MacDonald; G P Laing; M P Wilson; T W Wilson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Inter-arm blood pressure differences compared with ambulatory monitoring: a manifestation of the 'white-coat' effect?

Authors:  Una Martin; Roger Holder; James Hodgkinson; Richard McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the elderly.

Authors:  Juan Diego Mediavilla García; Fernando Jaén Águila; Celia Fernández Torres; Blas Gil Extremera; Juan Jiménez Alonso
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.420

5.  Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the main cities of Cameroon: prevalence of masked and white coat hypertension, and influence of body mass index.

Authors:  Noah Takah; Anastase Dzudie; Jules Ndjebet; Guela Wawo; Félicité Kamdem; Yves Monkam; Henry Luma; Kathleen Blackett Ngu; André Pascal Kengne
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 6.  What is an appropriate blood pressure goal for the elderly: review of recent studies and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Matthew G Denker; Debbie L Cohen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 7.  The applicability of home blood pressure measurement in clinical practice: a review of literature.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Abraham A Kroon; Heidi A Jongen-Vancraybex; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007

8.  Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of White Coat Effect in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and the Role of Automated Blood Pressure Device in its Assessment.

Authors:  Srinivas Shenoy; Shankar Prasad Nagaraju; Nileshwar R Rau; Ravindra A Prabhu; Uday Venkat Mateti; Dharshan Rangaswamy; Indu R Rao; Karan Saraf
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.