Literature DB >> 8866970

3-O-acetylmorphine-6-O-sulfate: a potent, centrally acting morphine derivative.

A A Houdi1, S Kottayil, P A Crooks, D A Butterfield.   

Abstract

In view of the potent analgesia exhibited by the apparent structurally dissimilar morphine-6-O-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-6-O-sulfate (M6S) conjugates of morphine, we have examined the effect of structural modification of M6S on analgesic activity, using the tail-flick test. Changes in the M6S structure were made that would affect the lipophilicity and polarity of the molecule. Subcutaneous (sc) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of equimolar doses of morphine, M6S, 3-O-acetylmorphine-6-O-sulfate (M3A6S), 3-O-benzoylmorphine-6-O-sulfate (M3B6S), and 3-O-acetyl-N-methylmorphinium-6-O-sulfate (MM3A6S) were employed. M6S and M3A6S exhibited a longer duration of action and greater activity compared to morphine after SC and ICV administration. However, M3B6S and MM3A6S in doses equimolar to that of morphine were found to be inactive after both SC and ICV administration. In addition, M3A6S showed the highest potency in inhibiting electrically stimulated guinea pig ileum followed by M6S and M3B6S. Moreover, both M6S and M3A6S displayed a greater affinity than that of morphine to mu and kappa 3 receptor sites in guinea pig brain homogenate. In contrast, the nonanalgesic compounds M3B6S and MM3A6S showed weak receptor binding ability compared to morphine. These results indicate that lipophilicity alone is not a determinant of analgesic activity in these novel morphine derivatives. These modified effects of morphine by the conjugations at the 3- and 6-position, appear to be due to their altered interactions with opioid receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8866970     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02067-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  6 in total

1.  Mapping of reinforcing and analgesic effects of the mu opioid agonist endomorphin-1 in the ventral midbrain of the rat.

Authors:  Thomas C Jhou; Sheng-Ping Xu; Mary R Lee; Courtney L Gallen; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Antinociceptive effects of the 6-O-sulfate ester of morphine in normal and diabetic rats: Comparative role of mu- and delta-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Jai Shankar K Yadlapalli; Benjamin M Ford; Amit Ketkar; Anqi Wan; Narasimha R Penthala; Robert L Eoff; Paul L Prather; Maxim Dobretsov; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 7.658

3.  On the Molecular Basis Underlying the Metabolism of Tapentadol Through Sulfation.

Authors:  Ahsan F Bairam; Mohammed I Rasool; Katsuhisa Kurogi; Ming-Cheh Liu
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Evaluation of Analgesia, Tolerance, and the Mechanism of Action of Morphine-6-O-Sulfate Across Multiple Pain Modalities in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Jai Shankar K Yadlapalli; Navdeep Dogra; Anqi W Walbaum; William D Wessinger; Paul L Prather; Peter A Crooks; Maxim Dobretsov
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Detection of morphine-3-sulfate and morphine-6-sulfate in human urine and plasma, and formation in liver cytosol.

Authors:  Maria Andersson; Linda Björkhem-Bergman; Lena Ekström; Lena Bergqvist; Hugo Lagercrantz; Anders Rane; Olof Beck
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2014-09-01

6.  Evaluation of morphine-like effects of the mixed mu/delta agonist morphine-6-O-sulfate in rats: Drug discrimination and physical dependence.

Authors:  Jai Shankar K Yadlapalli; Shoban Babu Bommagani; Ryan D Mahelona; Anqi Wan; Brenda M Gannon; Narsimha R Penthala; Maxim Dobretsov; Peter A Crooks; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2018-06-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.