Literature DB >> 8866920

A pharmacokinetic interaction study of didanosine coadministered with trimethoprim and/or sulphamethoxazole in HIV seropositive asymptomatic male patients.

N R Srinivas1, C A Knupp, B Batteiger, R A Smith, R H Barbhaiya.   

Abstract

1. The pharmacokinetics of didanosine, trimethoprim, and sulphamethoxazole were evaluated in ten HIV seropositive asymptomatic patients as single agents and upon coadministration of single doses. 2. Using a randomized, balanced incomplete block crossover study with at least a 1-week washout period between successive treatments, each patient under fasting conditions received four of the following five treatments: 200 mg didanosine as a single agent; 200 mg trimethoprim + 1000 mg sulphamethoxazole; 200 mg trimethoprim + 200 mg didanosine; 1000 mg sulphamethoxazole + 200 mg of didanosine and; 200 mg trimethoprim + 1000 mg sulphamethoxazole + 200 mg didanosine. 3. Serial blood and urine samples were collected following the administration of each treatment. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.)/ultraviolet assays specific for unchanged didanosine, trimethoprim and/or sulphamethoxazole. 4. Percent urinary recovery (%UR) and renal clearance (CLR) emerged as consistently affected parameters, being decreased in the case of didanosine (35%, P = 0.016) and trimethoprim (32%, P = 0.019) and increased in the case of sulphamethoxazole (39%, P = 0.079), when all three agents were coadministered. The magnitude of the changes in didanosine CLR and %UR values was no greater when both trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole were coadministered vs when each single agent was given with didanosine, suggesting that any effect was not additive. 5. Other key parameters such as Cmax, AUC, and t1/2 for didanosine (1309.9 ng ml-1, 1796.9 ng ml-1 h, and 1.61 h, respectively), trimethoprim (1.96 micrograms ml-1, 22.86 micrograms ml-1 h, and 9.03 h, respectively) or sulphamethoxazole (58.62 micrograms ml-1, 799.7 micrograms ml-1 h and 9.84 h, respectively) were not affected when didanosine was coadministered with either trimethoprim (didanosine: 1751.9 ng ml-1, 2158.0 ng ml-1 h, and 1.28 h; trimethoprim: 1.81 micrograms ml-1, 28.89 micrograms ml-1 h, and 11.4 h), sulphamethoxazole (didanosine: 1279.3 ng ml-1, 1793.2 ng ml-1 h, and 1.61 h; sulphamethoxazole: 53.57 micrograms ml-1, 732.1 micrograms ml-1 h, and 8.95 h), or the combination of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole (didanosine: 1283.7 ng ml-1, 1941.8 ng ml-1 h, and 1.38 h; trimethoprim: 1.59 micrograms ml-1, 26.68 micrograms ml-1 h, and 11.3 h; sulphamethoxazole: 59.48 micrograms ml-1, 760.9 micrograms ml-1 h, and 9.47 h). 6. Because the observed differences in CLR and %UR are small and not considered to be clinically relevant, it is not necessary to alter the dosing regimens of didanosine, trimethoprim or sulphamethoxazole when administered in combination to HIV seropositive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8866920     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  4 in total

Review 1.  Didanosine: an updated review of its use in HIV infection.

Authors:  C M Perry; S Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Anton Ivanyuk; Françoise Livio; Jérôme Biollaz; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  The pharmacokinetics and safety profile of oral ganciclovir in combination with trimethoprim in HIV- and CMV-seropositive patients.

Authors:  D Jung; M H AbdelHameed; J Hunter; P Teitelbaum; A Dorr; K Griffy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Improving antibacterial prescribing safety in the management of COPD exacerbations: systematic review of observational and clinical studies on potential drug interactions associated with frequently prescribed antibacterials among COPD patients.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Muh Akbar Bahar; Anouk M E Jansen; Janwillem W H Kocks; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Eelko Hak; Bob Wilffert; Sander D Borgsteede
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.