Literature DB >> 8866161

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment outcome in long-term users.

D A Fishbain1, C Chabal, A Abbott, L W Heine, R Cutler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous reviewers of the literature on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) outcome have concluded the following: (a) there are few long-term TENS follow-up studies, and (b) fewer studies have addressed the effect of long-term TENS use on outcome variables other than pain (e.g., function). DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/OUTCOME MEASURES: From a population of 2,003 chronic pain patients (CPPs) who bought a TENS device for pain management, 506 patients were randomly selected and interviewed by telephone long enough after purchase to allow at least 6 months of TENS use. The interview process used a structured "skip" questionnaire designed to assess the CPPs' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of TENS for a variety of outcome variables. Of the 506 CPPs interviewed, 376 (74.3%) had used their TENS device for 6 months or longer and were defined as long-term users. The responses of this group of CPPs to the telephone questionnaire were then subjected to statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Paired t-tests, correlated z-tests, SS Wilks, and chi-square tests demonstrated statistically significant change or improvement (p < 0.05) that paralleled the introduction of TENS use in the following outcome variables: less pain interference with work, home, and social activities; increased activity level and pain management; decreased use of other therapies (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy, chiropractic); decreased use of narcotics, tranquilizers, muscle relaxants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that TENS is associated with improvement on multiple outcome variables in addition to pain relief for CPPs who are long-term users. Also, for some CPPs, long-term TENS use continues to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8866161     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199609000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  8 in total

1.  What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature.

Authors:  Kathleen A Sluka; Jan M Bjordal; Serge Marchand; Barbara A Rakel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-05-02

2.  Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation Reduces Pathological Sensation of Mesh One Week after Open Inguinal Hernia Surgery: Follow-Up Results from a Randomized, Double Blind and Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Audrius Parseliunas; Saulius Paskauskas; Violeta Simatoniene; Egle Kubiliute; Edvinas Dainius; Andrejus Subocius; Linas Venclauskas; Donatas Venskutonis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  Complementary and alternative medicine in cancer pain management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Priyanka Singh; Aditi Chaturvedi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

4.  Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current on experimental ischemic pain models: frequencies of 50 hz and 100 hz.

Authors:  Young-Hyeon Bae; Suk Min Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-12-25

5.  Effectiveness of fixed-site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in chronic pain: a large-scale, observational study.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shai N Gozani; Thomas C Ferree; Martin Moynihan; Xuan Kong
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 7.  Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Primary Dysmenorrhea: An Overview.

Authors:  Michal Elboim-Gabyzon; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-01-08

8.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial: the TATE trial (ISRCTN 87141084).

Authors:  Linda S Chesterton; Daniëlle A van der Windt; Julius Sim; Martyn Lewis; Christian D Mallen; Elizabeth E Mason; Catherine Warlow; Kanchan Vohora; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.