Literature DB >> 8866105

Odor perception phenotypes: multiple, specific hyperosmias to musks.

A N Gilbert1, S E Kemp.   

Abstract

Olfactory detection thresholds for 11 structurally diverse musk odorants and one non-musk odorant were obtained from 32 subjects. Hierarchical cluster analysis produced four groups of subjects. One group (n = 12) was uniformly sensitive to all musks; another (n = 16) was uniformly insensitive. Two groups of subjects contained otherwise insensitive individuals who were exceptionally sensitive to cyclopentadecanone and musk xylol (n = 2) and to delta9-hexadecenolactone and tonalid (n = 2) respectively. We propose that the latter two groups are odor perception phenotypes (MSHM1 and MSHM2) that consist of multiple, specific hyperosmias to musk odorants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8866105     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/21.4.411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  10 in total

1.  A genome-wide study on the perception of the odorants androstenone and galaxolide.

Authors:  Antti Knaapila; Gu Zhu; Sarah E Medland; Charles J Wysocki; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  In vivo identification of eugenol-responsive and muscone-responsive mouse odorant receptors.

Authors:  Timothy S McClintock; Kaylin Adipietro; William B Titlow; Patrick Breheny; Andreas Walz; Peter Mombaerts; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Excretion and perception of a characteristic odor in urine after asparagus ingestion: a psychophysical and genetic study.

Authors:  Marcia Levin Pelchat; Cathy Bykowski; Fujiko F Duke; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  The inability to self-evaluate smell performance. How the vividness of mental images outweighs awareness of olfactory performance.

Authors:  Kathrin Kollndorfer; Ksenia Kowalczyk; Stefanie Nell; Jacqueline Krajnik; Christian A Mueller; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-18

5.  The Scent of Blood: A Driver of Human Behavior?

Authors:  James K Moran; Daniel R Dietrich; Thomas Elbert; Bettina M Pause; Lisa Kübler; Roland Weierstall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Chemical complexity of odors increases reliability of olfactory threshold testing.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Robert Pellegrino; Katharina Pusch; Celine Margot; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Greater hippocampal gray matter volume in subjective hyperosmia: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Pengfei Han; Franz Paul Stiller-Stut; Alexander Fjaeldstad; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Molecular vibration-sensing component in human olfaction.

Authors:  Simon Gane; Dimitris Georganakis; Klio Maniati; Manolis Vamvakias; Nikitas Ragoussis; Efthimios M C Skoulakis; Luca Turin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High-resolution copy-number variation map reflects human olfactory receptor diversity and evolution.

Authors:  Yehudit Hasin; Tsviya Olender; Miriam Khen; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Philip M Kim; Alexander Eckehart Urban; Michael Snyder; Mark B Gerstein; Doron Lancet; Jan O Korbel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  From musk to body odor: Decoding olfaction through genetic variation.

Authors:  Bingjie Li; Marissa L Kamarck; Qianqian Peng; Fei-Ling Lim; Andreas Keller; Monique A M Smeets; Joel D Mainland; Sijia Wang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.