Literature DB >> 8866054

Comparison between oral and written spelling in Alzheimer's disease.

B Croisile1, M J Brabant, T Carmoi, Y Lepage, G Aimard, M Trillet.   

Abstract

Written and oral spelling were compared in 33 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 25 control subjects. AD patients had poorer spelling results which were influenced by orthographic difficulty and word frequency, but not by grammatical word class. Lexical spelling was also more deteriorated than phonological spelling. Moreover, oral spelling was more impaired than written spelling in AD patients, whereas no difference was present between oral and written spelling of controls. Analysis of spelling errors showed that, for controls, errors were predominantly phonologically accurate in both spelling tasks. Significantly, AD patients produced more phonologically accurate than inaccurate errors in written spelling, whereas these errors did not differ in oral spelling. In contrast to controls who produced more constant than variable responses in oral and written spelling, AD patients made more variable responses (words correctly spelled in one task but incorrectly in the other) and they showed many instances of variable errors (different misspellings from one spelling task to the other). Two stepwise regression procedures showed that written misspellings were specifically correlated with language impairment, whereas oral spelling errors were correlated with attentional and language disorders. These results suggest that AD increases the attentional demands of oral spelling process as compared to written spelling. This dissociation argues, either for a unique Graphemic Buffer in which oral spelling requires more attentional resources than written spelling or for the hypothesis of separate buffers for oral and written spelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8866054     DOI: 10.1006/brln.1996.0081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Progressive apraxic agraphia with micrographia presenting as corticobasal syndrome showing extensive Pittsburgh compound B uptake.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Sakurai; Kenji Ishii; Masahiro Sonoo; Yuko Saito; Shigeo Murayama; Atsushi Iwata; Kensuke Hamada; Izumi Sugimoto; Shoji Tsuji; Toru Mannen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts.

Authors:  Hiroko H Dodge; Kenichi Meguro; Hiroshi Ishii; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Judith A Saxton; Mary Ganguli
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.878

Review 3.  Word-finding difficulty: a clinical analysis of the progressive aphasias.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; William D Knight; Jane E Warren; Nick C Fox; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Characteristics of Agraphia in Chinese Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Jiong Zhou; Biao Jiang; Xian-Hong Huang; Lin-Lin Kong; Hong-Lei Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.