Literature DB >> 8865559

Comparison of Doppler signal analysis techniques for velocity waveform, turbulence and vortex measurement: a simulation study.

Y Wang1, P J Fish.   

Abstract

Simulated time-varying Doppler signals incorporating bandwidth, power variation and vortex simulation have been used to compare a number of signal analysis techniques with a view to optimising the accuracy of convective velocity waveform, spectral broadening and vortex signal estimation. The short-time Fourier transform (STFT), the autoregressive (AR) modified covariance estimator, the time-frequency pseudo-Wigner-Ville and Choi-Williams distributions and a partial stationarising algorithm were investigated for a range of some analysis parameters (such as window duration, AR model order). It was found that all methods could estimate the convective velocity waveform well and all the nonclassical methods were an improvement over the STFT for bandwidth estimation with the stationarising method giving the lowest error. For vortex measurement, using parameters that were optimum for mean frequency and bandwidth estimation, the stationarising, modified covariance, pseudo-Wigner-Ville with a 10-ms window and Choi-Williams methods gave improved performances compared with the STFT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865559     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(96)00015-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  2 in total

1.  Performance of short-time spectral parametric methods for reducing the variance of the Doppler ultrasound mean instantaneous frequency estimation.

Authors:  H Sava; L G Durand; G Cloutier
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound: Part 1: Signal processing and instrumentation.

Authors:  P J Fish; P R Hoskins; C Moran; W N McDicken
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.