Literature DB >> 8864795

In vitro and in vivo protein binding of methotrexate assessed by microdialysis.

M B Maia1, S Saivin, E Chatelut, M F Malmary, G Houin.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was firstly to estimate methotrexate protein binding using microdialysis, and secondly to determine the influence of the protein content in the dialyzed medium on the dialysis membrane recovery. In vitro recovery was estimated by both water recovery method and concentration difference method. The relative recovery was independent of methotrexate concentration: 39.3% +/- 2.86% and 39.2 +/- 1.27% for 50 microM and 300 microM, respectively. A significant influence of the presence of proteins on the dialysis membrane recovery was observed: 55.9% +/- 2.7%, 42.3% +/- 7.5% and 45.5% +/- 0.1% for buffer, human serum albumin (HSA) (600 microM) and human plasma, respectively. Methotrexate binding to human and rat plasma proteins showed a nonsaturable phenomenon. The bound percentages and corresponding total binding capacities were 58.7% +/- 3.13% and 1.44 +/- 0.033 mM-1 and 71.7% +/- 4.38% and 2.18 +/- 0.09 mM-1 for the human and rat plasma, respectively. For HSA this binding was saturable with an affinity constant of 4.75 +/- 0.66 mM-1. After intravenous administration (250 mg/kg) the in vivo rat plasma binding of methotrexate was roughly 20% higher (93.6%) than the in vitro methotrexate plasma binding. The in vivo relative recovery of methotrexate was found to be 12.6% +/- 1.8% versus 25.4% +/- 3.3% in vitro. This study showed that the protein content can directly affect microdialysis probe recovery. However, by taking into account this recovery, microdialysis allows to measure the protein binding of methotrexate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8864795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  5 in total

1.  Urinary coproporphyrin I/(I + III) ratio as a surrogate for MRP2 or other transporter activities involved in methotrexate clearance.

Authors:  Isabelle Benz-de Bretagne; Noël Zahr; Amélie Le Gouge; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Caroline Houillier; Khe Hoang-Xuan; Emmanuel Gyan; Séverine Lissandre; Sylvain Choquet; Chantal Le Guellec
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Development of a dog microdialysis model for determining synovial fluid pharmacokinetics of anti-arthritis compounds exemplified by methotrexate.

Authors:  Mingxin Qian; Wanda West; Jing-Tao Wu; Bing Lu; David D Christ
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Effect of blood brain barrier permeability in recurrent high grade gliomas on the intratumoral pharmacokinetics of methotrexate: a microdialysis study.

Authors:  Jaishri O Blakeley; Jeffrey Olson; Stuart A Grossman; Xiaoying He; Jon Weingart; Jeffrey G Supko
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Preventing and Managing Toxicities of High-Dose Methotrexate.

Authors:  Scott C Howard; John McCormick; Ching-Hon Pui; Randall K Buddington; R Donald Harvey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  Evaluation and Application of Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Identifying Delayed Methotrexate Elimination in Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Authors:  Junjun Mao; Qing Li; Pei Li; Weiwei Qin; Bobin Chen; Mingkang Zhong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.