Literature DB >> 8864784

Left ventricular regression equations from single plane cine and digital X-ray ventriculograms revisited.

J H Reiber1, A R Viddeleer, G Koning, M J Schalij, P E Lange.   

Abstract

For the assessment of left ventricular volume from X-ray ventriculograms, widely known regression equations are used to correct for the irregular shape of the left ventricular lumen and the presence of the papillary muscles and trabeculations. These regression equations were derived in the late nineteen sixties and seventies. With all the changes in X-ray technology that have taken place over the past 20-30 years, the question was raised whether these regression equations were still valid. Therefore, 23 left ventricular casts of known volume were imaged in RAO20, RAO30 and RAO40 angiographic views and recorded on 35 mm cinefilm as well as in digital format. All the frames were traced manually by two observers and the volumes calculated by the Area Length and Simpson Rule approaches. The following conclusions could be drawn: inter- and intra-observer variations were small (systematic differences < 1.5 ml; random differences < 2.9 ml) and statistically not significant; the regression equations are virtually the same for the RAO20, RAO30 and RAO40 views under the different circumstances; the Area Length method was associated with slightly smaller values for the standard-error-of-the-estimate (SEE) suggesting a slight preference for this approach versus the Simpson Rule; significant differences were found between the cinefilm and digital regression equations; and the following new regression equations are proposed, which indeed differ significantly from the earliest proposals and less from the monoplane formulas proposed by Kennedy & Lange in the 1970s: [table: see text]

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8864784     DOI: 10.1007/bf01880736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  10 in total

1.  The use of biplane angiocardigraphy for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man.

Authors:  H T DODGE; H SANDLER; D W BALLEW; J D LORD
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Use of biplane cinefluorography for measurement of ventricular volume.

Authors:  C B CHAPMAN; O BAKER; J REYNOLDS; F J BONTE
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1958-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Usefulness of digital angiography in the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  G Koning; M van den Brand; I Zorn; G Loois; J H Reiber
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Dimensional analysis of the heart--a review.

Authors:  H Sandler
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.378

5.  The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man.

Authors:  H Sandler; H T Dodge
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods.

Authors:  J W Kennedy; S E Trenholme; I S Kasser
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Automated and accurate assessment of the distribution, magnitude, and direction of pincushion distortion in angiographic images.

Authors:  P M van der Zwet; D J Meyer; J H Reiber
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Estimation of left ventricular volumes in man from biplane cineangiograms filmed in oblique projections.

Authors:  J Wynne; L H Green; T Mann; D Levin; W Grossman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Analysis of left and right ventricular size and shape, as determined from human casts. Description of the method and its validation.

Authors:  P E Lange; D Onnasch; F L Farr; V Malerczyk; P H Heintzen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiol       Date:  1978-11

10.  Angiocardiographic left ventricular volume determination. Accuracy, as determined from human casts, and clinical application.

Authors:  P E Lange; D Onnasch; F L Farr; P H Heintzen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiol       Date:  1978-11
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Good correlation between gated single photon emission computed myocardial tomography and contrast ventriculography in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function.

Authors:  D E Atsma; C D Bavelaar-Croon; G Germano; P Dibbets-Schneider; B L van Eck-Smit; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-12

2.  End-diastolic and end-systolic volume from the left ventricular angiogram: how accurate is visual frame selection? Comparison between visual and semi-automated comnputer-assisted analysis.

Authors:  Eva M Staal; Martine de Heer; J Wouter Jukema; Gerhard Koning; Ernst E van der Wall; Johan H C Reiber; Jan Baan; Paul Steendijk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Normal left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment with quantitative digital cardioangiography.

Authors:  C Masquet; M S Slama; A Dibie; F H Sheehan; J Liénard
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-02

4.  Assessment of left ventricular function with steady-state-free-precession magnetic resonance imaging. Reference values and a comparison to left ventriculography.

Authors:  O Grebe; H A Kestler; N Merkle; J Wöhrle; M Kochs; M Höher; V Hombach
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.