Literature DB >> 8864311

Disposition of diazepam in young and elderly subjects after acute and chronic dosing.

R J Herman1, G R Wilkinson.   

Abstract

1. The pharmacokinetics of diazepam were examined in seven young (20-30 years) and six elderly (60-75 years) males prior to and also after chronic oral dosing of diazepam. 2. Following intravenous administration, the half-life and volume of distribution of 14C-labelled diazepam in the elderly were approximately twofold greater than corresponding estimates in younger subjects (mean +/- s.d., 71.5 +/- 27.6 vs 44.5 +/- 16.5 h and 1.39 +/- 0.32 vs 0.88 +/- 0.30 1 kg-1, respectively). Clearance did not differ between the two groups (0.26 +/- 0.09 vs 0.29 +/- 0.09 ml min-1 kg-1). 3. The accumulation of diazepam and its major metabolite, desmethyldiazepam, were extensive during chronic administration. A radioreceptor assay that measured total benzodiazepine activity, including diazepam and its active metabolites, indicated that the accumulation of 'benzodiazepine equivalents' was similar to the sum of the accumulated diazepam and desmethyldiazepam concentration levels. However, the level of 'benzodiazepine equivalents' on multiple-dosing was about double that of the predicted steady-state 'equivalent' concentration from single-dose studies. This was due to the insensitivity of the radioreceptor assay for desmethyldiazepam following single-dose diazepam administration. 4. There were no age- or dosing-related differences in diazepam clearance (0.37 +/- 0.22 vs 0.32 +/- 0.18 ml min-1 kg-1, young vs elderly, single-dose; 0.37 +/- 0.11 vs 0.27 +/- 0.12 ml min-1 kg-1, young vs elderly, multiple-dose) and no age-related differences in the levels of accumulated 'benzodiazepine equivalents' (243.7 +/- 60.1 vs 288.0 +/- 125.8 ng ml-1, young vs elderly). 5. Thus, changes that occur in diazepam disposition with ageing after acute administration do not appear to be important during chronic dosing. On the other hand, accumulation of diazepam and desmethyldiazepam are considerable and would be expected to be clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8864311      PMCID: PMC2042656          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03642.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  6 in total

1.  Voriconazole and fluconazole increase the exposure to oral diazepam.

Authors:  Teijo I Saari; Kari Laine; Leif Bertilsson; Pertti J Neuvonen; Klaus T Olkkola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Maintenance time of sedative effects after an intravenous infusion of diazepam: a guide for endoscopy using diazepam.

Authors:  Mitsushige Sugimoto; Takahisa Furuta; Akiko Nakamura; Naohito Shirai; Mutsuhiro Ikuma; Shingen Misaka; Shinya Uchida; Hiroshi Watanabe; Kyoichi Ohashi; Takashi Ishizaki; Akira Hishida
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B M Power; A M Forbes; P V van Heerden; K F Ilett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Drug dosage in the elderly. Is it rational?

Authors:  K Turnheim
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Free drug metabolic clearance in elderly people.

Authors:  Jennifer M Butler; Evan J Begg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  The Effect of Methylphenidate on Reed Scaling in Benzodiazepine Poisoning: A Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Masoud Latifi-Pour; Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam; Helya-Sadat Mortazavi; Shahin Shadnia; Nasim Zamani; Mitra Rahimi
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.