Literature DB >> 8864090

An assessment of pain and return to normal activity. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair.

C J Filipi1, F Gaston-Johansson, P J McBride, K Murayama, J Gerhardt, D A Cornet, R J Lund, D Hirai, R Graham, K Patil, R Fitzgibbons, R D Gaines.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation.
METHODS: In a randomized prospective study transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate.
RESULTS: The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization.
CONCLUSION: Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8864090     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Cost containment and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  L P Farinas; F D Griffen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Driving after repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  P K Amid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

3.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Economic evaluation of laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphies: the effect of cost-containment measures and internal hospital policy decisions on costs and charges.

Authors:  Y S Khajanchee; T A G Kenyon; P D Hansen; L L Swanström
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Total extra-peritoneal repair of groin hernia: prospective evaluation at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  M C Misra; V K Bansal; S Kumar; B Prashant; H K Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Jens Redecke; Michael Butters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.