Literature DB >> 8864042

An endpoint, descriptive, and kinematic comparison of skilled reaching in mice (Mus musculus) with rats (Rattus norvegicus).

I Q Whishaw1.   

Abstract

The forelimb and paw movements of mice were compared with those of rats in two skilled reaching for food tasks. Both species could use a single forelimb to reach for food, as measured in two different tasks, although performance was better and more consistent in rats than in mice. Both species located the food using olfaction, and moved from a diagonal supporting pattern in which support and postural adjustments came mainly from the contralateral to reaching forelimb and the ipsilateral to reaching hindlimb. Forelimb movements in both species could be divided into 3 components: (1) a transport component in which the limb is lifted, aimed, advanced, and pronated over the food using mainly movements of the upper limb; (2) a manipulatory component in which the digits are pronated over the food in an arpeggio movement and in which the digits grasp the food using grips that are scaled to the size of the food; and (3) a withdrawal component, in which the paw is supinated by adduction by the upper arm and by a movement about the wrist, as the food is withdrawn and presented to the mouth. Kinematic measures showed that the initial velocity of reaching in mice was slower than for rats, but otherwise the shape of the velocity curve and the trajectory of the limb movement, above and beyond the food pellet, were similar in both species. The results suggest that the motor control of reaching in the two rodent species is almost the same despite an evolutionary divergence that occurred about 20 million years ago. This profile of movement could be useful for investigating motor systems in normal mice and it could be applied to the analysis of motor systems in mutant and transgenic mice suspected of having motor abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8864042     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00236-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  30 in total

1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced forelimb movement in a rodent model.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; James V Lynskey; Danielle Protas; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Cerebellar Control of Reach Kinematics for Endpoint Precision.

Authors:  Matthew I Becker; Abigail L Person
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Organization of the reach and grasp in head-fixed vs freely-moving mice provides support for multiple motor channel theory of neocortical organization.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jamshid Faraji; Jessica Kuntz; Behroo Mirza Agha; Mukt Patel; Gerlinde A S Metz; Majid H Mohajerani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Study motor skill learning by single-pellet reaching tasks in mice.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Chen; Anthony Gilmore; Yi Zuo
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Skill learning induced plasticity of motor cortical representations is time and age-dependent.

Authors:  Kelly A Tennant; DeAnna L Adkins; Matthew D Scalco; Nicole A Donlan; Aaron L Asay; Nagheme Thomas; Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Internal and External Feedback Circuits for Skilled Forelimb Movement.

Authors:  Eiman Azim; Andrew J P Fink; Thomas M Jessell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-02-19

7.  Perinatal nicotine exposure impairs learning of a skilled forelimb reaching task in male but not female adult mice.

Authors:  Angela M Lee; Marina R Picciotto
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Absolute number of parvicellular and magnocellular neurons in the red nucleus of the rat midbrain: a stereological study.

Authors:  Benjamin E Aghoghovwia; Dorothy E Oorschot
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Development of visual and somatosensory attention of the reach-to-eat movement in human infants aged 6 to 12 months.

Authors:  Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jenni M Karl; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cholinergic upregulation by optogenetic stimulation of nucleus basalis after photothrombotic stroke in forelimb somatosensory cortex improves endpoint and motor but not sensory control of skilled reaching in mice.

Authors:  Behroo Mirza Agha; Roya Akbary; Arashk Ghasroddashti; Mojtaba Nazari-Ahangarkolaee; Ian Q Whishaw; Majid H Mohajerani
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.