B G Tabet1, S Levine. 1. Department of Anesthesia, St. Luke's Hospital, Bluefield, West Virginia 24701, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We describe a novel technique for anesthetizing the prostate, which should be used for patients at risk undergoing prostate surgery with general, spinal or epidural anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local anesthesia to the prostatic plexus supplemented by monitored anesthesia care was performed on 40 patients with outflow obstruction secondary to an enlarged prostate. Of the patients 34 underwent transurethral resection of the prostate, 5 underwent visual laser ablation and 1 underwent transurethral electrovaporization. A 20 gauge spinal needle was inserted via a suprapubic approach toward the base and apex of the prostate, and guided by the left index finger inserted into the rectum. Lidocaine was injected into the prerectal space. Bulging of the rectal wall caused by the amount of lidocaine injected was appreciated. Insertion into the proper area was essential for a good anesthetic result. RESULTS: Adequate anesthesia levels could be obtained without major complications. All but 1 patient with poor bladder compliance were rendered free of a Foley catheter. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This technique has definite advantages for patients who are at risk for prostate surgery with general or spinal anesthesia.
PURPOSE: We describe a novel technique for anesthetizing the prostate, which should be used for patients at risk undergoing prostate surgery with general, spinal or epidural anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local anesthesia to the prostatic plexus supplemented by monitored anesthesia care was performed on 40 patients with outflow obstruction secondary to an enlarged prostate. Of the patients 34 underwent transurethral resection of the prostate, 5 underwent visual laser ablation and 1 underwent transurethral electrovaporization. A 20 gauge spinal needle was inserted via a suprapubic approach toward the base and apex of the prostate, and guided by the left index finger inserted into the rectum. Lidocaine was injected into the prerectal space. Bulging of the rectal wall caused by the amount of lidocaine injected was appreciated. Insertion into the proper area was essential for a good anesthetic result. RESULTS: Adequate anesthesia levels could be obtained without major complications. All but 1 patient with poor bladder compliance were rendered free of a Foley catheter. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This technique has definite advantages for patients who are at risk for prostate surgery with general or spinal anesthesia.
Authors: Michael Müntener; Markus Fatzer; Valentin Praz; Urs Straumann; Räto T Strebel; Hubert John Journal: World J Urol Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 4.226