Literature DB >> 8863539

Cost-effectiveness of different treatment options for staghorn calculi.

P S Chandhoke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The cost-effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and combined sandwich therapy in the treatment of staghorn calculi was examined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cost-effective index, which estimates the average cost of making 1 patient stone-free, was computed for the various treatment options. Data for effectiveness of each therapy were used as available from the literature. Billing charges were used as cost data from University Hospital and the Kidney Stone Center.
RESULTS: Average charges for a single percutaneous nephrolithotomy were $26,622, of which 81% were facility charges and 7.9% urologist fees. Average charges for a single shock wave lithotripsy were $8,213, 60.3% of which were facility fees and 33.3% of which were urologist charges. Overall, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and combined sandwich therapy were more cost-effective than shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy. When the stone surface area was less than 500 mm2 combined sandwich therapy and shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy were equally cost-effective. However, when the stone burden was greater than 500 mm2 combined sandwich therapy clearly became more cost-effective than shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy followed by shock wave lithotripsy, if necessary, and second look nephroscopy are the most cost-effective methods of treating staghorn calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8863539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with multiple mini tracts in a single session in treating staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Wen Zhong; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu; Wenzhong Chen; Kaijun Wu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-09-07

2.  Which efficiency index for urinary stones treatment?

Authors:  Gauthier Raynal; Jacques Petit; Fabien Saint
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-06-10

3.  Time-dependent oxidative stress effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Haluk Söylemez; Yaşar Bozkurt; Necmettin Penbegül; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Bülent Altunoluk; Murat Atar; Osman Evliyaoglu; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for intrarenal stones in patients with solitary kidney: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Zhichao Huang; Fajun Fu; Zhaohui Zhong; Lei Zhang; Ran Xu; Xiaokun Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Economics of stone disease/treatment.

Authors:  Walter Ludwig Strohmaier
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-03-22

6.  Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi.

Authors:  S V Krishna Reddy; Ahammad Basha Shaik
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.